Prevalence of modifiable risk factors in cognitive aging cohort participants in Bangkok, Thailand

Abstract Background Dementia poses an escalating socioeconomic challenge, yet evidence suggests potential prevention through proactive correction of risk factors and multidomain interventions. In cost‐conscious Thailand, targeting prevalent risk factors may offer the most feasible strategy for disease prevention, ultimately alleviating healthcare burdens. Method Non‐demented participants were consecutively selected from the INDIE cohort, a longitudinal study on cognitive aging at Chulalongkorn University in Bangkok, Thailand. A 40‐minute interview encompassed symptoms, risk factors, social determinants of health, and quality of life. Modifiable risk factors for dementia were identified through an comprehensive literature review (Table 1) and categorized as modifiable at the individual level (e.g., still uncontrolled in the participant) or at the population level (indicating sufficient efforts by the participant). Beyond examining prevalence in the entire cohort, we explored the number of risk factors present in each participant and assessed the impact of correcting these factors on dementia prevention using figures from the Lancet Commission (Livingston, 2020). Result Non‐demented participants were consecutively selected from the INDIE cohort, a longitudinal study on cognitive aging at Chulalongkorn University in Bangkok, Thailand. A 40‐minute interview encompassed symptoms, risk factors, social determinants of health, and quality of life. Modifiable risk factors for dementia were identified through an comprehensive literature review (Table 1) and categorized as modifiable at the individual level (e.g., still uncontrolled in the participant) or at the population level (indicating sufficient efforts by the participant). Beyond examining prevalence in the entire cohort, we explored the number of risk factors present in each participant and assessed the impact of correcting these factors on dementia prevention using figures from the Lancet Commission (Livingston, 2020). Conclusion This underscores the necessity for healthcare policies targeting dementia prevention, emphasizing modifiable risk factors like low physical activity. While the impact of correcting these risk factors on an individual may seem modest, it can be substantial for those at high dementia risk, particularly when identified through biomarkers. Limitations include a small sample size and non‐generalizable participant selection; future research should extend to rural communities and impoverished urban areas with larger anddiverse samples.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.092176
Primary Topic
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prevalence of modifiable risk factors in cognitive aging cohort participants in Bangkok, Thailand

Thiravat Hemachudha, Poosanu Thanapornsangsuth, Pannita Sengpanich
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
article

Prevalence of modifiable risk factors in cognitive aging cohort participants in Bangkok, Thailand

Thiravat Hemachudha, Poosanu Thanapornsangsuth, Pannita Sengpanich
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Dementia poses an escalating socioeconomic challenge, yet evidence suggests potential prevention through proactive correction of risk factors and multidomain interventions. In cost‐conscious Thailand, targeting prevalent risk factors may offer the most feasible strategy for disease prevention, ultimately alleviating healthcare burdens. Method Non‐demented participants were consecutively selected from the INDIE cohort, a longitudinal study on cognitive aging at Chulalongkorn University in Bangkok, Thailand. A 40‐minute interview encompassed symptoms, risk factors, social determinants of health, and quality of life. Modifiable risk factors for dementia were identified through an comprehensive literature review (Table 1) and categorized as modifiable at the individual level (e.g., still uncontrolled in the participant) or at the population level (indicating sufficient efforts by the participant). Beyond examining prevalence in the entire cohort, we explored the number of risk factors present in each participant and assessed the impact of correcting these factors on dementia prevention using figures from the Lancet Commission (Livingston, 2020). Result Non‐demented participants were consecutively selected from the INDIE cohort, a longitudinal study on cognitive aging at Chulalongkorn University in Bangkok, Thailand. A 40‐minute interview encompassed symptoms, risk factors, social determinants of health, and quality of life. Modifiable risk factors for dementia were identified through an comprehensive literature review (Table 1) and categorized as modifiable at the individual level (e.g., still uncontrolled in the participant) or at the population level (indicating sufficient efforts by the participant). Beyond examining prevalence in the entire cohort, we explored the number of risk factors present in each participant and assessed the impact of correcting these factors on dementia prevention using figures from the Lancet Commission (Livingston, 2020). Conclusion This underscores the necessity for healthcare policies targeting dementia prevention, emphasizing modifiable risk factors like low physical activity. While the impact of correcting these risk factors on an individual may seem modest, it can be substantial for those at high dementia risk, particularly when identified through biomarkers. Limitations include a small sample size and non‐generalizable participant selection; future research should extend to rural communities and impoverished urban areas with larger anddiverse samples.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S7)
Thai Red Cross Society (TH), Chulalongkorn University (TH), King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.