Construction of the Cognitive Function Trajectory File

Abstract Background Characterizing changes in cognitive function during the last years of life is vital for providing appropriate care, supporting quality of life, and planning for future demands on our medical and social resources. The aim of this project was to construct a cognitive function trajectory file spanning the last five years of life to better understand common patterns of cognitive aging. Method The analytic cohort included 2019 Medicare decedents, aged 50 or older at death, with five years of continuous enrollment before death (n = 1,952,408). We extracted and harmonized cognitive function data elements from Medicare fee‐for‐service claims, encounter file, assessment, and Medicaid data during 2014‐2019. The data elements used for harmonization included ICD‐9 and ICD‐10 codes, the Brief Interview for Mental Status, and other cognitive function assessment items. We created a four‐category indicator for cognitive function: no impairment, memory loss, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia/severe cognitive impairment. Similar to our approach to creating the care trajectory file, the cognitive function trajectory file was expanded at day‐level and then collapsed quarterly (3‐month) basis for the last five years of life (20 quarters). We employed a thorough carry‐forward method to address gaps in information. Result Using the information from combined assessment and claims, at death 69% of individuals aged 90 and older had dementia and 13% had MCI, and among individuals age 80‐89, 56% had dementia and 14% had MCI. Females had greater cognitive impairment at death (56% dementia, 14.4% MCI) compared to males (44.5% dementia, 15% MCI). Cognitive function at the end of life was similar across racial and ethnic groups: White (50.4% dementia, 15.1% MCI); Black (52.3% dementia, 14.7% MCI); Hispanic (51.43% dementia, 12.1% MCI); Asian American/Pacific Islander (AAPI) (52.7% dementia, 13.1% MCI); American Indian/Alaska Native (43.6% dementia, 15.2% MCI). Conclusion The successful construction of this analytic file allows for the exploration of varying patterns of cognitive functional decline and their multi‐level predictors including individual, community, societal, and environmental factors. This approach can also be applied in research for development of new dementia care strategies and risk‐ and protective factors associated with cognitive decline.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.090919
Primary Topic
Technology and Human Factors in Education and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Construction of the Cognitive Function Trajectory File

Haiqun Lin, Hyosin Kim, Olga F Jarrín Montaner, María José López et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Technology and Human Factors in Education and Health
article

Construction of the Cognitive Function Trajectory File

Haiqun Lin, Hyosin Kim, Olga F Jarrín Montaner, María José López, Anum Zafar, Weiyi Xia
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Characterizing changes in cognitive function during the last years of life is vital for providing appropriate care, supporting quality of life, and planning for future demands on our medical and social resources. The aim of this project was to construct a cognitive function trajectory file spanning the last five years of life to better understand common patterns of cognitive aging. Method The analytic cohort included 2019 Medicare decedents, aged 50 or older at death, with five years of continuous enrollment before death (n = 1,952,408). We extracted and harmonized cognitive function data elements from Medicare fee‐for‐service claims, encounter file, assessment, and Medicaid data during 2014‐2019. The data elements used for harmonization included ICD‐9 and ICD‐10 codes, the Brief Interview for Mental Status, and other cognitive function assessment items. We created a four‐category indicator for cognitive function: no impairment, memory loss, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia/severe cognitive impairment. Similar to our approach to creating the care trajectory file, the cognitive function trajectory file was expanded at day‐level and then collapsed quarterly (3‐month) basis for the last five years of life (20 quarters). We employed a thorough carry‐forward method to address gaps in information. Result Using the information from combined assessment and claims, at death 69% of individuals aged 90 and older had dementia and 13% had MCI, and among individuals age 80‐89, 56% had dementia and 14% had MCI. Females had greater cognitive impairment at death (56% dementia, 14.4% MCI) compared to males (44.5% dementia, 15% MCI). Cognitive function at the end of life was similar across racial and ethnic groups: White (50.4% dementia, 15.1% MCI); Black (52.3% dementia, 14.7% MCI); Hispanic (51.43% dementia, 12.1% MCI); Asian American/Pacific Islander (AAPI) (52.7% dementia, 13.1% MCI); American Indian/Alaska Native (43.6% dementia, 15.2% MCI). Conclusion The successful construction of this analytic file allows for the exploration of varying patterns of cognitive functional decline and their multi‐level predictors including individual, community, societal, and environmental factors. This approach can also be applied in research for development of new dementia care strategies and risk‐ and protective factors associated with cognitive decline.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S7)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Oregon State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Technology and Human Factors in Education and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.