5.6% lidocaine aerosol anesthesia for supragingival ultrasonic scaling in patients with chronic periodontitis or dental plaque-induced gingivitis

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and patient satisfaction of lidocaine aerosol for pain management during periodontal scaling and root planning in patients with chronic periodontitis or dental plaque-induced gingivitis. This study specifically concentrated on comparing the effectiveness of lidocaine aerosol as a topical anesthetic against a placebo, assessing its impact on pain perception during the procedure. Additionally, the relationship between periodontal treatment and the reduction of oxidative stress markers in these patients was assessed. Eighty-six patients with chronic periodontitis or dental plaque-induced gingivitis were included. Notably, 5.6% lidocaine and placebo aerosols were randomly applied to the labial (buccal) and lingual (palatal) sides, approximately 3 mm from the gingival surface, with three sprays on each side, prior to supragingival ultrasonic scaling in these patients. In this controlled, double-blind study, the effectiveness of a 5.6% lidocaine aerosol in reducing pain during supragingival ultrasonic scaling was evaluated. The study involved 50 patients who divided into two groups: one receiving the lidocaine aerosol and the other a placebo. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The results revealed a statistically significant reduction in pain scores in the lidocaine group compared with the placebo group. Specifically, the mean VAS score in the lidocaine group was 2.1 ± 1.3, compared with 5.6 ± 1.7 in the placebo group (P < 0.01). Similarly, the NRS scores were significantly lower in the lidocaine group (2.3 ± 1.2) compared with the placebo group (5.9 ± 1.8, P < 0.01). No adverse reactions were found in none of the groups. 5.6% lidocaine aerosol holds promise as an effective anesthetic option for reducing pain during supragingival ultrasonic scaling procedures in patients with chronic periodontitis or dental plaque-induced gingivitis. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR2000029831, date: 2020-02-15).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-85864-9
Primary Topic
Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

5.6% lidocaine aerosol anesthesia for supragingival ultrasonic scaling in patients with chronic periodontitis or dental plaque-induced gingivitis

Qingxian Luan, Xue Li
Scientific Reports
Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
article

5.6% lidocaine aerosol anesthesia for supragingival ultrasonic scaling in patients with chronic periodontitis or dental plaque-induced gingivitis

Qingxian Luan, Xue Li
article en

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and patient satisfaction of lidocaine aerosol for pain management during periodontal scaling and root planning in patients with chronic periodontitis or dental plaque-induced gingivitis. This study specifically concentrated on comparing the effectiveness of lidocaine aerosol as a topical anesthetic against a placebo, assessing its impact on pain perception during the procedure. Additionally, the relationship between periodontal treatment and the reduction of oxidative stress markers in these patients was assessed. Eighty-six patients with chronic periodontitis or dental plaque-induced gingivitis were included. Notably, 5.6% lidocaine and placebo aerosols were randomly applied to the labial (buccal) and lingual (palatal) sides, approximately 3 mm from the gingival surface, with three sprays on each side, prior to supragingival ultrasonic scaling in these patients. In this controlled, double-blind study, the effectiveness of a 5.6% lidocaine aerosol in reducing pain during supragingival ultrasonic scaling was evaluated. The study involved 50 patients who divided into two groups: one receiving the lidocaine aerosol and the other a placebo. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The results revealed a statistically significant reduction in pain scores in the lidocaine group compared with the placebo group. Specifically, the mean VAS score in the lidocaine group was 2.1 ± 1.3, compared with 5.6 ± 1.7 in the placebo group (P < 0.01). Similarly, the NRS scores were significantly lower in the lidocaine group (2.3 ± 1.2) compared with the placebo group (5.9 ± 1.8, P < 0.01). No adverse reactions were found in none of the groups. 5.6% lidocaine aerosol holds promise as an effective anesthetic option for reducing pain during supragingival ultrasonic scaling procedures in patients with chronic periodontitis or dental plaque-induced gingivitis. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR2000029831, date: 2020-02-15).

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Peking University (CN), Stomatology Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.