Cutting through the noise: Assessing tools that employ artificial intelligence

The popularization of artificial intelligence (AI) represents a significant business opportunity for private actors developing tools and services aimed at research and higher education. Academic libraries are often at the receiving end of sales pitches for new tools and could benefit from guidance on how to assess them. Libraries’ assessment of tools is a valuable service to library stakeholders, many of whom may not have sufficient time, the necessary competencies or the inclination to explore the landscape of innovations promising to support their information needs and research endeavours. This article offers concrete guidance concerning what to consider when assessing whether to adopt, endorse and/or invest in innovative information and research tools that make use of AI. The main areas proposed for reflection concern (a) tool purpose, design and technical aspects; (b) information literacy, academic craftsmanship and integrity; (c) ethics and the political economy of AI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IFLA Journal
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352241304121
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Public Procurement and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cutting through the noise: Assessing tools that employ artificial intelligence

Letıcia Antunes Nogueira, Inga Buset Langfeldt, Stine Thordarson Moltubakk, Andreas Fagervik
2 citations
IFLA Journal
Public Procurement and Policy
4.45
article

Cutting through the noise: Assessing tools that employ artificial intelligence

Letıcia Antunes Nogueira, Inga Buset Langfeldt, Stine Thordarson Moltubakk, Andreas Fagervik
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The popularization of artificial intelligence (AI) represents a significant business opportunity for private actors developing tools and services aimed at research and higher education. Academic libraries are often at the receiving end of sales pitches for new tools and could benefit from guidance on how to assess them. Libraries’ assessment of tools is a valuable service to library stakeholders, many of whom may not have sufficient time, the necessary competencies or the inclination to explore the landscape of innovations promising to support their information needs and research endeavours. This article offers concrete guidance concerning what to consider when assessing whether to adopt, endorse and/or invest in innovative information and research tools that make use of AI. The main areas proposed for reflection concern (a) tool purpose, design and technical aspects; (b) information literacy, academic craftsmanship and integrity; (c) ethics and the political economy of AI.

IFLA JournalVol. 51(3)
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Public Procurement and Policy
4.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.