Frequency of modifiable risk factors in primary care compared with tertiary care in Brazil

Abstract Background The Better at Home Program (BHP) is a Brazilian government initiative to provide dehospitalization through homecare health access in primary care. The profile of modifiable risk factors of dementia in this vulnerable population may provide targets for public health policies, as it represents the majority of the Brazilian population. In this study, we aimed at investigating the profile of modifiable risk factors in primary care compared with a tertiary care clinic in Brazil. Method Community‐dwelling patients attending the BHP and from tertiary memory clinics were invited to participate. We collected demographic variables, the profile of modifiable risk factors of dementia, neuropsychological battery and blood sampling of both primary and tertiary care settings. Frequency of risk factors were compared with chi‐squared tests and quantitative demographic variables were compared with parametric tests. Results A total of 59 patients were included in primary care (mean 72.3±7.9 years of age, 62.7% females) and 63 in tertiary care setting (mean 70±11 years, 66.6% females). Primary care patients were significantly less educated compared with tertiary centers (7.44±3.9 vs. 16±5.34), and more racially diverse (Table), with similar MMSE scores (22.76±5.31 vs. 22±6.97). The profile of frequency of modifiable risk factors of dementia was distinct according to the level of care (Figure). Specifically, individuals from primary care presented increased frequency of low education (23 vs. 3, p = 0.03), social isolation (37 vs. 22, p = 0.007), physical inactivity (31 vs 10, p = 0.0001) and smoking. Furthermore, people in homebound situations were identified only in the primary care group (11 vs. 0, p<0.001). Conclusion Patients from primary care services present a distinct profile of modifiable risk factors of dementia when compared with tertiary care. They presented increased frequency of low education, social isolation, physical inactivity, and smoking. Public policies targeting primary care populations in LMIC may address risk factors differently.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.092547
Primary Topic
Public Health in Brazil
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Frequency of modifiable risk factors in primary care compared with tertiary care in Brazil

Brunna Jaeger Tello, Jeanette Farina, Ana Catarina Maia, Eduardo Rigon Zimmer et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Public Health in Brazil
article

Frequency of modifiable risk factors in primary care compared with tertiary care in Brazil

Brunna Jaeger Tello, Jeanette Farina, Ana Catarina Maia, Eduardo Rigon Zimmer, Anelise Fuhr, Mariana Dagnino Araújo, Sheila Cristina Ouriques Martins, Giovanna Carello‐Collar, Raphael Machado Castilhos, Vivian Silveira Vasques, Pedro Rosa‐Neto, Núbia Freitas, Wyllians Vendramini Borelli
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The Better at Home Program (BHP) is a Brazilian government initiative to provide dehospitalization through homecare health access in primary care. The profile of modifiable risk factors of dementia in this vulnerable population may provide targets for public health policies, as it represents the majority of the Brazilian population. In this study, we aimed at investigating the profile of modifiable risk factors in primary care compared with a tertiary care clinic in Brazil. Method Community‐dwelling patients attending the BHP and from tertiary memory clinics were invited to participate. We collected demographic variables, the profile of modifiable risk factors of dementia, neuropsychological battery and blood sampling of both primary and tertiary care settings. Frequency of risk factors were compared with chi‐squared tests and quantitative demographic variables were compared with parametric tests. Results A total of 59 patients were included in primary care (mean 72.3±7.9 years of age, 62.7% females) and 63 in tertiary care setting (mean 70±11 years, 66.6% females). Primary care patients were significantly less educated compared with tertiary centers (7.44±3.9 vs. 16±5.34), and more racially diverse (Table), with similar MMSE scores (22.76±5.31 vs. 22±6.97). The profile of frequency of modifiable risk factors of dementia was distinct according to the level of care (Figure). Specifically, individuals from primary care presented increased frequency of low education (23 vs. 3, p = 0.03), social isolation (37 vs. 22, p = 0.007), physical inactivity (31 vs 10, p = 0.0001) and smoking. Furthermore, people in homebound situations were identified only in the primary care group (11 vs. 0, p<0.001). Conclusion Patients from primary care services present a distinct profile of modifiable risk factors of dementia when compared with tertiary care. They presented increased frequency of low education, social isolation, physical inactivity, and smoking. Public policies targeting primary care populations in LMIC may address risk factors differently.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S7)
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), Hospital Moinhos de Vento (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Public Health in Brazil
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.