Athlete Responsibility vs. Procedural Fairness: A Legal Examination of Vinesh Phogat’s Disqualification

The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) case involving Vinesh Phogat, a prominent Indian wrestler at the 2024 Paris Olympics, serves as a significant precedent in sports law emphasizing the importance of strict adherence to competition rules. Phogat was disqualified from the Women’s Freestyle 50 kg final after failing the second weigh-in by a margin of 100 grams. Despite her appeal, the CAS upheld her disqualification citing the clarity of United World Wrestling (UWW) rules and the necessity of maintaining consistency and fairness in competition. The dispute revolved around Article 11 of the UWW Rules which prohibits any weight tolerance for the second weigh-in. Phogat argued that her marginal weight excess was influenced by physiological factors including pre-menstrual water retention and asserted that such biological realities should be considered in applying the rules. However, the Sole Arbitrator concluded that these factors while natural cannot excuse non-compliance with weight requirements as they fall within the professional responsibilities of experienced athletes. The CAS decision reiterates the principle that athletes are responsible for complying with competition rules regardless of mitigating circumstances. Article 7 of the UWW Rules was pivotal in this regard as it states that athletes voluntarily participate in their chosen weight category and bear full responsibility for meeting the associated requirements. As an experienced wrestler Phogat was found to have understood the rules and made efforts to comply yet ultimately failed to meet the criteria. While the CAS ruling underscores the importance of strict liability and consistency in sports regulations it also raises questions about the balance between fairness and rigid rule enforcement. Moreover, the case highlights the challenges faced by athletes in competitions where natural biological processes like menstruation intersect with stringent weight requirements.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Entertainment and Sports Law Journal
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.16997/eslj.1775
Primary Topic
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Athlete Responsibility vs. Procedural Fairness: A Legal Examination of Vinesh Phogat’s Disqualification

Entertainment and Sports Law Journal
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
article

Athlete Responsibility vs. Procedural Fairness: A Legal Examination of Vinesh Phogat’s Disqualification

article en

Abstract

The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) case involving Vinesh Phogat, a prominent Indian wrestler at the 2024 Paris Olympics, serves as a significant precedent in sports law emphasizing the importance of strict adherence to competition rules. Phogat was disqualified from the Women’s Freestyle 50 kg final after failing the second weigh-in by a margin of 100 grams. Despite her appeal, the CAS upheld her disqualification citing the clarity of United World Wrestling (UWW) rules and the necessity of maintaining consistency and fairness in competition. The dispute revolved around Article 11 of the UWW Rules which prohibits any weight tolerance for the second weigh-in. Phogat argued that her marginal weight excess was influenced by physiological factors including pre-menstrual water retention and asserted that such biological realities should be considered in applying the rules. However, the Sole Arbitrator concluded that these factors while natural cannot excuse non-compliance with weight requirements as they fall within the professional responsibilities of experienced athletes. The CAS decision reiterates the principle that athletes are responsible for complying with competition rules regardless of mitigating circumstances. Article 7 of the UWW Rules was pivotal in this regard as it states that athletes voluntarily participate in their chosen weight category and bear full responsibility for meeting the associated requirements. As an experienced wrestler Phogat was found to have understood the rules and made efforts to comply yet ultimately failed to meet the criteria. While the CAS ruling underscores the importance of strict liability and consistency in sports regulations it also raises questions about the balance between fairness and rigid rule enforcement. Moreover, the case highlights the challenges faced by athletes in competitions where natural biological processes like menstruation intersect with stringent weight requirements.

Entertainment and Sports Law JournalVol. 23(1)
Symbiosis International University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.