LA JUSTICIABILIDAD DE LOS DESC MEDIANTE UN ANALISIS DE SENTENCIAS DEL TRIBUNAL EUROPEO Y LA CORTE INTERAMERICANA DE DERECHOS HUMANOS

This article provides a comparative view of the justiciability of ESCR in the European and Inter-Ame-rican Regional Systems for the Protection of Human Rights. It examines the regulations on ESCR in force in the European Convention on Human Rights of 1950 and the European Social Charter of 1961of the European System, and the American Convention on Human Rights of 1969 and the Protocol ofSan Salvador of 1988, of the Inter-American System, respectively; as well as the jurisprudence of thehuman rights courts to determine how the justiciability of ESCR has been approached in both systems,noting that despite the fact that the European Court of Human Rights, through its jurisprudence, was the first to establish the interrelationship between civil rights and ESCR in 1973, it has avoided recog-nizing direct violations of these rights, while the Inter-American Court of Human Rights since 2017, it modified its line of interpretation and declared itself competent to hear direct violations of ESCR,despite the restrictions existing in Article 19.6 of the Protocol of San Salvador.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Spanish Journal of Legislative Studies
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21134/mwd8ny21
Primary Topic
Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LA JUSTICIABILIDAD DE LOS DESC MEDIANTE UN ANALISIS DE SENTENCIAS DEL TRIBUNAL EUROPEO Y LA CORTE INTERAMERICANA DE DERECHOS HUMANOS

Yoseland César Pinto
Spanish Journal of Legislative Studies
Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
article

LA JUSTICIABILIDAD DE LOS DESC MEDIANTE UN ANALISIS DE SENTENCIAS DEL TRIBUNAL EUROPEO Y LA CORTE INTERAMERICANA DE DERECHOS HUMANOS

Yoseland César Pinto
article en

Abstract

This article provides a comparative view of the justiciability of ESCR in the European and Inter-Ame-rican Regional Systems for the Protection of Human Rights. It examines the regulations on ESCR in force in the European Convention on Human Rights of 1950 and the European Social Charter of 1961of the European System, and the American Convention on Human Rights of 1969 and the Protocol ofSan Salvador of 1988, of the Inter-American System, respectively; as well as the jurisprudence of thehuman rights courts to determine how the justiciability of ESCR has been approached in both systems,noting that despite the fact that the European Court of Human Rights, through its jurisprudence, was the first to establish the interrelationship between civil rights and ESCR in 1973, it has avoided recog-nizing direct violations of these rights, while the Inter-American Court of Human Rights since 2017, it modified its line of interpretation and declared itself competent to hear direct violations of ESCR,despite the restrictions existing in Article 19.6 of the Protocol of San Salvador.

Spanish Journal of Legislative Studies(6)
Universidad de Alcalá (ES)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.