Followers’ Locomotion Mode Predicts Preferring Assertive Leaders: Regulatory Fit by Means of Valued Social Characteristics of Others

ABSTRACT Building on prior work on regulatory fit in leader–follower contexts, the present work investigated such fit regarding followers’ locomotion mode (the concern to move forward and maintain action flow) and leader assertiveness. In three studies, we recruited English‐speaking employees online ( N total = 948) and assessed their regulatory mode. In Study 1, we then measured participants’ preferences regarding characteristics their leaders ideally should have. In Study 2, participants reported perceived characteristics (ability/assertiveness/morality/friendliness) of their actual leader. In Study 3, we presented participants with a highly assertive versus highly able leader profile. Participants subsequently indicated their expected satisfaction with and motivation by these leaders. Across studies, the higher the followers’ locomotion mode, the more they valued their leader being assertive. These findings show that feelings of fit can also derive from an alignment with others’ characteristics and shed light on when leader assertiveness is appreciated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Social Psychology
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.3141
Primary Topic
Behavioral Health and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Followers’ Locomotion Mode Predicts Preferring Assertive Leaders: Regulatory Fit by Means of Valued Social Characteristics of Others

Karl‐Andrew Woltin, Julien Barbedor, Magali Beylat, Kai Sassenberg et al.
European Journal of Social Psychology
Behavioral Health and Interventions
article

Followers’ Locomotion Mode Predicts Preferring Assertive Leaders: Regulatory Fit by Means of Valued Social Characteristics of Others

Karl‐Andrew Woltin, Julien Barbedor, Magali Beylat, Kai Sassenberg, Vincent Yzerbyt
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Building on prior work on regulatory fit in leader–follower contexts, the present work investigated such fit regarding followers’ locomotion mode (the concern to move forward and maintain action flow) and leader assertiveness. In three studies, we recruited English‐speaking employees online ( N total = 948) and assessed their regulatory mode. In Study 1, we then measured participants’ preferences regarding characteristics their leaders ideally should have. In Study 2, participants reported perceived characteristics (ability/assertiveness/morality/friendliness) of their actual leader. In Study 3, we presented participants with a highly assertive versus highly able leader profile. Participants subsequently indicated their expected satisfaction with and motivation by these leaders. Across studies, the higher the followers’ locomotion mode, the more they valued their leader being assertive. These findings show that feelings of fit can also derive from an alignment with others’ characteristics and shed light on when leader assertiveness is appreciated.

European Journal of Social PsychologyVol. 55(2)
Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE), Leibniz Institute for Psychology (DE), Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien (DE), UCLouvain (BE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Behavioral Health and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Followers’ Locomotion Mode Predicts Preferring Assertive Leaders: Regulatory Fit by Means of Valued Social Characteristics of Others — Karl‐Andrew Woltin, Julien Barbedor, et al. · European Journal of Social Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS