Overlooked discrepancies in protocols undermine coastal restoration practices in China
To improve the success of expanding ecosystem restoration efforts, technical guiding-standards are being developed in many nations. Whether these protocols have been well adopted to guide restoration practices remains unknown, especially in developing countries where policies evolve rapidly to balance socioeconomic development with ecosystem restoration. By conducting text semantic mining analyses, we reveal widespread discrepancies between China’s coastal restoration practices and protocols over the past four decades. Over 60% of executed restoration projects had no detailed technical standards to guide implementation, especially for severely degraded ecosystems. Development of these standards lagged significantly behind project implementation, was poorly enforced, and focused more on monitoring than guiding good restoration designs and adaptive management, likely undermining restoration performance. Nevertheless, current policies toward prioritizing ecosystem restoration offer opportunities to remedy this issue. Enforcing policies to ensure that practices are guided by protocols is necessary to promote coastal restoration success in China and globally as nations strive to achieve ambitious restoration targets. Lack of detailed technical standards, poor implementation, focusing less on good restoration designs, and adaptive management undermined the coastal restoration practices in China in last four decades, according to a text semantic mining analysis.
Authors
- Cong Chen
- Christopher Craft (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3345-6592)
- Zhenchang Zhu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6749-1850)
- Zhonghua Ning (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2350-7982)
- Baoshan Cui (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0830-2295)
- Tjeerd Joris Bouma (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7824-7546)
- Shanze Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3246-3571)
- Tian Xie (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0917-1290)
- Guogui Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3931-079X)
- Qiang He (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6481-0924)
- Qīng Wáng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3997-6767)
- Yujia Zhai (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4262-0307)
- Junhong Bai (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2613-2143)
- Zhifeng Yang
Institutions
- Guangdong University of Technology (CN)
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Fudan University (CN)
- Beijing Normal University (CN)
- Beijing Forestry University (CN)
- China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research (CN)
- Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NL)
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Communications Earth & Environment
- Published
- 2025-01-09
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-01995-x
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Coastal and Marine Management
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.42
Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China