Overlooked discrepancies in protocols undermine coastal restoration practices in China

To improve the success of expanding ecosystem restoration efforts, technical guiding-standards are being developed in many nations. Whether these protocols have been well adopted to guide restoration practices remains unknown, especially in developing countries where policies evolve rapidly to balance socioeconomic development with ecosystem restoration. By conducting text semantic mining analyses, we reveal widespread discrepancies between China’s coastal restoration practices and protocols over the past four decades. Over 60% of executed restoration projects had no detailed technical standards to guide implementation, especially for severely degraded ecosystems. Development of these standards lagged significantly behind project implementation, was poorly enforced, and focused more on monitoring than guiding good restoration designs and adaptive management, likely undermining restoration performance. Nevertheless, current policies toward prioritizing ecosystem restoration offer opportunities to remedy this issue. Enforcing policies to ensure that practices are guided by protocols is necessary to promote coastal restoration success in China and globally as nations strive to achieve ambitious restoration targets. Lack of detailed technical standards, poor implementation, focusing less on good restoration designs, and adaptive management undermined the coastal restoration practices in China in last four decades, according to a text semantic mining analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Earth & Environment
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-01995-x
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Coastal and Marine Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Overlooked discrepancies in protocols undermine coastal restoration practices in China

Cong Chen, Christopher Craft, Zhenchang Zhu, Zhonghua Ning et al.
1 citations
Communications Earth & Environment
Coastal and Marine Management
2.42
article

Overlooked discrepancies in protocols undermine coastal restoration practices in China

Cong Chen, Christopher Craft, Zhenchang Zhu, Zhonghua Ning, Baoshan Cui, Tjeerd Joris Bouma, Shanze Li, Tian Xie, Guogui Chen, Qiang He, Qīng Wáng, Yujia Zhai, Junhong Bai, Zhifeng Yang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

To improve the success of expanding ecosystem restoration efforts, technical guiding-standards are being developed in many nations. Whether these protocols have been well adopted to guide restoration practices remains unknown, especially in developing countries where policies evolve rapidly to balance socioeconomic development with ecosystem restoration. By conducting text semantic mining analyses, we reveal widespread discrepancies between China’s coastal restoration practices and protocols over the past four decades. Over 60% of executed restoration projects had no detailed technical standards to guide implementation, especially for severely degraded ecosystems. Development of these standards lagged significantly behind project implementation, was poorly enforced, and focused more on monitoring than guiding good restoration designs and adaptive management, likely undermining restoration performance. Nevertheless, current policies toward prioritizing ecosystem restoration offer opportunities to remedy this issue. Enforcing policies to ensure that practices are guided by protocols is necessary to promote coastal restoration success in China and globally as nations strive to achieve ambitious restoration targets. Lack of detailed technical standards, poor implementation, focusing less on good restoration designs, and adaptive management undermined the coastal restoration practices in China in last four decades, according to a text semantic mining analysis.

Communications Earth & EnvironmentVol. 6(1)
Guangdong University of Technology (CN), Utrecht University (NL), Fudan University (CN), Beijing Normal University (CN), Beijing Forestry University (CN), China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research (CN), Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NL), Indiana University Bloomington (US), State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Coastal and Marine Management
2.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.