Equation for Calculation of Critical Current Density Using the Bean’s Model with Self-Consistent Magnetic Units to Prevent Unit Conversion Errors

This study analyzes the calculation of the critical current density <i>J<sub>c,mag</sub></i> by means of Bean's critical state model, using the equation formulated by Gyorgy et al. and other similar equations derived from it reported in the literature. While estimations of <i>J<sub>c,mag</sub></i> using Bean's model are widely performed, improper use of different equations with different magnetic units and pre-factors leads to confusion and to significant errors in the reported values of <i>J<sub>c,mag</sub></i>. In this work, a SINGLE general equation is proposed for the calculation of <i>J<sub>c,mag</sub></i> for a rectangular parallelepiped sample in perpendicular field using Bean's critical state model, underlying how the simple conversion of magnetic units can lead to a <i>J<sub>c,mag</sub></i> in the desired units, without the need to introduce any other correction or use other specific equations depending on the units of <i>J<sub>c,mag</sub></i>. In this equation, the numerical pre-factor is dimensionless, independent of the unit system used. A comparison between the expression reported in the literature is done, showing how they can lead to different results depending on the used units, and that these results can be at least one order of magnitude different from the correct results obtained with the general equation proposed in this work. This resolves all ambiguities and aligns with the correct dimensional analysis, eliminates discrepancies in the calculated <i>J<sub>c,mag</sub></i>, and will avoid further propagation of errors in the literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18020269
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Equation for Calculation of Critical Current Density Using the Bean’s Model with Self-Consistent Magnetic Units to Prevent Unit Conversion Errors

Armando Galluzzi, M. Polichetti, Rohit Kumar, Amit Kumar Goyal
10 citations
Materials
Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
12.58
article

Equation for Calculation of Critical Current Density Using the Bean’s Model with Self-Consistent Magnetic Units to Prevent Unit Conversion Errors

Armando Galluzzi, M. Polichetti, Rohit Kumar, Amit Kumar Goyal
article en
10 citations

Abstract

This study analyzes the calculation of the critical current density <i>J<sub>c,mag</sub></i> by means of Bean's critical state model, using the equation formulated by Gyorgy et al. and other similar equations derived from it reported in the literature. While estimations of <i>J<sub>c,mag</sub></i> using Bean's model are widely performed, improper use of different equations with different magnetic units and pre-factors leads to confusion and to significant errors in the reported values of <i>J<sub>c,mag</sub></i>. In this work, a SINGLE general equation is proposed for the calculation of <i>J<sub>c,mag</sub></i> for a rectangular parallelepiped sample in perpendicular field using Bean's critical state model, underlying how the simple conversion of magnetic units can lead to a <i>J<sub>c,mag</sub></i> in the desired units, without the need to introduce any other correction or use other specific equations depending on the units of <i>J<sub>c,mag</sub></i>. In this equation, the numerical pre-factor is dimensionless, independent of the unit system used. A comparison between the expression reported in the literature is done, showing how they can lead to different results depending on the used units, and that these results can be at least one order of magnitude different from the correct results obtained with the general equation proposed in this work. This resolves all ambiguities and aligns with the correct dimensional analysis, eliminates discrepancies in the calculated <i>J<sub>c,mag</sub></i>, and will avoid further propagation of errors in the literature.

MaterialsVol. 18(2)
University of Salerno (IT), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
European Cooperation in Science and Technology, Office of Naval Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
12.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.