Stark localization near Aubry-André criticality

In this work, we investigate the Stark localization near the Aubry-Andr\'e (AA) critical point. We perform careful studies for reporting system-dependent parameters, such as localization length, inverse participation ratio (IPR), and energy gap between the ground and first excited state, for characterizing the localization-delocalization transition. We show that the scaling exponents possessed by these key descriptors of localization are quite different from that of a pure AA model or Stark model. Near the critical point of the AA model, in the presence of Stark field of strength $h$, the localization length $\ensuremath{\zeta}$ scales as $\ensuremath{\zeta}\ensuremath{\propto}{h}^{\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\nu}}$ with $\ensuremath{\nu}\ensuremath{\approx}0.29$, which is different from both the pure AA model $(\ensuremath{\nu}=1)$ and Stark model $(\ensuremath{\nu}\ensuremath{\approx}0.33)$. The IPR in this case scales as IPR $\ensuremath{\propto}{h}^{s}$ with $s\ensuremath{\approx}0.096$, which is again significantly different from both the pure AA model $(s\ensuremath{\approx}0.33)$ and Stark model $(s\ensuremath{\approx}0.33)$. The energy gap, $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}$, scales as $E\ensuremath{\propto}{h}^{\ensuremath{\nu}z}$, where $z\ensuremath{\approx}2.37$, which is however the same as the pure AA model. Finally, we discuss how invoking a criticality-inducing additional control parameter may help in designing better many-body quantum sensors. Quantum critical sensors exploit the venerability of the wave function near the quantum critical point against small parameter shifts. By incorporating a control parameter in the form of the quasiperiodic field, i.e., the AA potential, we show a significant advantage can be drawn in estimating an unknown parameter, which is considered here to be the Stark weak field strength, with high precision. We compute and extract the scaling exponent associated with the quantum Fisher information, ${F}_{Q}$, which provides a bound on the uncertainty associated with measuring an unknown parameter. We demonstrate that by a control field in the form of the quasiperiodic potential, and setting it at AA criticality, ${F}_{Q}$ scales with the system size as ${F}_{Q}\ensuremath{\propto}{L}^{\ensuremath{\beta}}$, where $\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{\approx}6.7$, which is greater in comparison to the pure Stark case, for which $\ensuremath{\beta}$ is known to be 5.8. We, thus, pitch a generic idea of invoking quantum-criticality-inducing additional control parameters for obtaining enhanced quantum advantage in many-body critical sensors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. B./Physical review. B
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.111.024205
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stark localization near Aubry-André criticality

Ayan Sahoo, Debraj Rakshit, Aitijhya Saha
9 citations
Physical review. B./Physical review. B
Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
11.91
article

Stark localization near Aubry-André criticality

Ayan Sahoo, Debraj Rakshit, Aitijhya Saha
article en
9 citations

Abstract

In this work, we investigate the Stark localization near the Aubry-Andr\'e (AA) critical point. We perform careful studies for reporting system-dependent parameters, such as localization length, inverse participation ratio (IPR), and energy gap between the ground and first excited state, for characterizing the localization-delocalization transition. We show that the scaling exponents possessed by these key descriptors of localization are quite different from that of a pure AA model or Stark model. Near the critical point of the AA model, in the presence of Stark field of strength $h$, the localization length $\ensuremath{\zeta}$ scales as $\ensuremath{\zeta}\ensuremath{\propto}{h}^{\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\nu}}$ with $\ensuremath{\nu}\ensuremath{\approx}0.29$, which is different from both the pure AA model $(\ensuremath{\nu}=1)$ and Stark model $(\ensuremath{\nu}\ensuremath{\approx}0.33)$. The IPR in this case scales as IPR $\ensuremath{\propto}{h}^{s}$ with $s\ensuremath{\approx}0.096$, which is again significantly different from both the pure AA model $(s\ensuremath{\approx}0.33)$ and Stark model $(s\ensuremath{\approx}0.33)$. The energy gap, $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}$, scales as $E\ensuremath{\propto}{h}^{\ensuremath{\nu}z}$, where $z\ensuremath{\approx}2.37$, which is however the same as the pure AA model. Finally, we discuss how invoking a criticality-inducing additional control parameter may help in designing better many-body quantum sensors. Quantum critical sensors exploit the venerability of the wave function near the quantum critical point against small parameter shifts. By incorporating a control parameter in the form of the quasiperiodic field, i.e., the AA potential, we show a significant advantage can be drawn in estimating an unknown parameter, which is considered here to be the Stark weak field strength, with high precision. We compute and extract the scaling exponent associated with the quantum Fisher information, ${F}_{Q}$, which provides a bound on the uncertainty associated with measuring an unknown parameter. We demonstrate that by a control field in the form of the quasiperiodic potential, and setting it at AA criticality, ${F}_{Q}$ scales with the system size as ${F}_{Q}\ensuremath{\propto}{L}^{\ensuremath{\beta}}$, where $\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{\approx}6.7$, which is greater in comparison to the pure Stark case, for which $\ensuremath{\beta}$ is known to be 5.8. We, thus, pitch a generic idea of invoking quantum-criticality-inducing additional control parameters for obtaining enhanced quantum advantage in many-body critical sensors.

Physical review. B./Physical review. BVol. 111(2)
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (IN), Homi Bhabha National Institute (IN), Harish-Chandra Research Institute (IN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
11.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.