Thompson Sampling for Non-Stationary Bandit Problems

Non-stationary multi-armed bandit (MAB) problems have recently attracted extensive attention. We focus on the abruptly changing scenario where reward distributions remain constant for a certain period and change at unknown time steps. Although Thompson sampling (TS) has shown success in non-stationary settings, there is currently no regret bound analysis for TS with uninformative priors. To address this, we propose two algorithms, discounted TS and sliding-window TS, designed for sub-Gaussian reward distributions. For these algorithms, we establish an upper bound for the expected regret by bounding the expected number of times a suboptimal arm is played. We show that the regret upper bounds of both algorithms are O~(TBT), where <i>T</i> is the time horizon and BT is the number of breakpoints. This upper bound matches the lower bound for abruptly changing problems up to a logarithmic factor. Empirical comparisons with other non-stationary bandit algorithms highlight the competitive performance of our proposed methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Entropy
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/e27010051
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thompson Sampling for Non-Stationary Bandit Problems

Fei Guo, Qi Han, Li Zhu
5 citations
Entropy
Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
10.53
article

Thompson Sampling for Non-Stationary Bandit Problems

Fei Guo, Qi Han, Li Zhu
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Non-stationary multi-armed bandit (MAB) problems have recently attracted extensive attention. We focus on the abruptly changing scenario where reward distributions remain constant for a certain period and change at unknown time steps. Although Thompson sampling (TS) has shown success in non-stationary settings, there is currently no regret bound analysis for TS with uninformative priors. To address this, we propose two algorithms, discounted TS and sliding-window TS, designed for sub-Gaussian reward distributions. For these algorithms, we establish an upper bound for the expected regret by bounding the expected number of times a suboptimal arm is played. We show that the regret upper bounds of both algorithms are O~(TBT), where <i>T</i> is the time horizon and BT is the number of breakpoints. This upper bound matches the lower bound for abruptly changing problems up to a logarithmic factor. Empirical comparisons with other non-stationary bandit algorithms highlight the competitive performance of our proposed methods.

EntropyVol. 27(1)
Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
10.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Thompson Sampling for Non-Stationary Bandit Problems — Fei Guo, Qi Han, et al. · Entropy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS