Utilization of Palliative Care in Cardiogenic Shock Patients: A Retrospective Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample Database, 2020

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Cardiogenic shock (CS) is one of the leading causes of death in patients with myocardial infarction, myocarditis, and congestive heart failure. The utilization patterns of specialist palliative care (PC) consultation in these patients are currently unknown. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> To determine the utilization of PC in patients with CS and the overall comorbidities of that population. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Review of the 2020 National Inpatient Sample identified 6,471,165 hospitalizations of which 38,531 patients were hospitalized with CS via International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10 CM) code R57.0. Demographics and details of hospitalization were compared for patients who received PC evaluation (<i>N</i> = 8457) and those who did not (<i>N</i> = 30,074) as identified via ICD-10 CM code Z51.5. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Patients who received PC evaluation were older (≥65 years: 69.01% vs. 55.04%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), had shorter hospital stays (<14 days: 78.92% vs. 70.35% patients, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and higher in-hospital mortality (65.80% vs. 24.23%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) with higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (≥4, 55.22% vs. 48.09%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Furthermore, the patients who received PC had significantly higher odds of death than those who did not (adjusted odds ratio = 6, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Despite high mortality rates, specialist PC is not routinely involved in the care of those who die with CS, although does appear to be utilized among those most likely to die. This suggests preferential utilization of specialist PC for terminal patients; however, further research will be helpful to better understand current consult practices and increase PC utilization for this highly morbid population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Palliative Medicine
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0116
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Utilization of Palliative Care in Cardiogenic Shock Patients: A Retrospective Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample Database, 2020

Astrid Grouls, Dhruv Kumar, Sabiha Armin, Akriti Agrawal et al.
1 citations
Journal of Palliative Medicine
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
2.25
article

Utilization of Palliative Care in Cardiogenic Shock Patients: A Retrospective Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample Database, 2020

Astrid Grouls, Dhruv Kumar, Sabiha Armin, Akriti Agrawal, Ashish Shrivastava, Ishan Gupta, Alisha Young, RISHI PANJALA, Arun Dontaraju, ARNAV GARYALI, Adishwar Rao, Saahith Garg, Abhiram Gannamaneni, Srikar Yeruva
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Cardiogenic shock (CS) is one of the leading causes of death in patients with myocardial infarction, myocarditis, and congestive heart failure. The utilization patterns of specialist palliative care (PC) consultation in these patients are currently unknown. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> To determine the utilization of PC in patients with CS and the overall comorbidities of that population. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Review of the 2020 National Inpatient Sample identified 6,471,165 hospitalizations of which 38,531 patients were hospitalized with CS via International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10 CM) code R57.0. Demographics and details of hospitalization were compared for patients who received PC evaluation (<i>N</i> = 8457) and those who did not (<i>N</i> = 30,074) as identified via ICD-10 CM code Z51.5. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Patients who received PC evaluation were older (≥65 years: 69.01% vs. 55.04%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), had shorter hospital stays (<14 days: 78.92% vs. 70.35% patients, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and higher in-hospital mortality (65.80% vs. 24.23%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) with higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (≥4, 55.22% vs. 48.09%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Furthermore, the patients who received PC had significantly higher odds of death than those who did not (adjusted odds ratio = 6, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Despite high mortality rates, specialist PC is not routinely involved in the care of those who die with CS, although does appear to be utilized among those most likely to die. This suggests preferential utilization of specialist PC for terminal patients; however, further research will be helpful to better understand current consult practices and increase PC utilization for this highly morbid population.

Journal of Palliative MedicineVol. 28(4)
High Point University (US), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US), Baylor University (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), SUNY Upstate Medical University (US), Guthrie Robert Packer Hospital (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US), Texas A&M University (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
2.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.