THE COMPARISON OF DEFORMATION CALCULATION RESULTS OF STRUCTURES UNDER SEISMIC IMPACT USING MOHR-COULOMB AND HARDENING SOIL SMALL (HSS) SOIL MODELS

This study examines the behavior of buildings under seismic impacts considering different soil models. Nowadays, along with the use of numerical methods in the analysis and design of engineering projects, it is known that this method is widely used in the analysis of problems related to geotechnical engineering construction. Comparative data on displacements, moments, and forces have been obtained for the Mohr-Coulomb soil model and the Hardening Soil Small (HSS) model. The software Plaxis 2D is used for the analysis of both models. The application of such complexes requires special attention to soil foundation models and parameter assignment. The selection of appropriate parameters and soil models can significantly influence the results of numerical analysis. The Mohr Coulomb elastic-plastic model is one of the most widely used models adopted in cases of hardness estimation of materials independent of surface tension. However, it was found that, the stress stiffness in the behaviour model and the difference in stiffness between initial loading and unloading/re-loading are important modelling aspects when discussing seismic effects and play an important role in predicting ground motions. A comprehensive comparison of the results for the Mohr-Coulomb and Hardening Soil models reveals several important differences, which are presented in this article.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of Kazakh Leading Academy of Architecture and Construction
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51488/1680-080x/2024.4-16
Primary Topic
Geotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE COMPARISON OF DEFORMATION CALCULATION RESULTS OF STRUCTURES UNDER SEISMIC IMPACT USING MOHR-COULOMB AND HARDENING SOIL SMALL (HSS) SOIL MODELS

S.Е. Niyetbay, Ulugbek T. Begaliev, А.S. Shadkam, Yerik T. Bessimbayev
Bulletin of Kazakh Leading Academy of Architecture and Construction
Geotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering
article

THE COMPARISON OF DEFORMATION CALCULATION RESULTS OF STRUCTURES UNDER SEISMIC IMPACT USING MOHR-COULOMB AND HARDENING SOIL SMALL (HSS) SOIL MODELS

S.Е. Niyetbay, Ulugbek T. Begaliev, А.S. Shadkam, Yerik T. Bessimbayev
article en

Abstract

This study examines the behavior of buildings under seismic impacts considering different soil models. Nowadays, along with the use of numerical methods in the analysis and design of engineering projects, it is known that this method is widely used in the analysis of problems related to geotechnical engineering construction. Comparative data on displacements, moments, and forces have been obtained for the Mohr-Coulomb soil model and the Hardening Soil Small (HSS) model. The software Plaxis 2D is used for the analysis of both models. The application of such complexes requires special attention to soil foundation models and parameter assignment. The selection of appropriate parameters and soil models can significantly influence the results of numerical analysis. The Mohr Coulomb elastic-plastic model is one of the most widely used models adopted in cases of hardness estimation of materials independent of surface tension. However, it was found that, the stress stiffness in the behaviour model and the difference in stiffness between initial loading and unloading/re-loading are important modelling aspects when discussing seismic effects and play an important role in predicting ground motions. A comprehensive comparison of the results for the Mohr-Coulomb and Hardening Soil models reveals several important differences, which are presented in this article.

Bulletin of Kazakh Leading Academy of Architecture and ConstructionVol. 94(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Geotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.