Accuracy of survey-based assessment of eligibility for medication abortion compared with clinician assessment

History-based screening protocols are highly effective at ensuring that few people receive medication abortion when ineligible. However, a sizable group screens as ineligible when they are in fact eligible, suggesting a need for more specific screening questions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2025.01.008
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.51

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy of survey-based assessment of eligibility for medication abortion compared with clinician assessment

L Ralph, Tammi Kromenaker, K Ehrenreich, Nathalie Kapp et al.
4 citations
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Reproductive Health and Contraception
7.51
article

Accuracy of survey-based assessment of eligibility for medication abortion compared with clinician assessment

L Ralph, Tammi Kromenaker, K Ehrenreich, Nathalie Kapp, Susan Williams, M. Antonia Biggs, D Grossman, G Moayedi, Kelly Blanchard, Ena Suseth Valladares, E Raymond, Tanvi Gurazada, Jamila Perritt, S Kaller, D S Hauser, Jessica Pinckney Gil, D. Jane Taylor, Katherine J. Curtis White
article en
4 citations

Abstract

History-based screening protocols are highly effective at ensuring that few people receive medication abortion when ineligible. However, a sizable group screens as ineligible when they are in fact eligible, suggesting a need for more specific screening questions.

American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 233(1)
Advocates for Youth (US), Emory Healthcare (US), Physicians for Human Rights (US), University of Arizona (US), Emory University (US), Minnesota State University Moorhead (US), University of Phoenix (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), University of Washington (US), International Planned Parenthood Federation (GB), California Latinas for Reproductive Justice (US), Center for Health Justice (US), Institute for Reproductive Health (US), Ibis Reproductive Health (US), Phoenix College (US), University of San Francisco (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Society of Family Planning
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
7.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Accuracy of survey-based assessment of eligibility for medication abortion compared with clinician assessment — L Ralph, Tammi Kromenaker, et al. · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS