Fear extinction retention in children, adolescents, and adults

Past results suggest that fear extinction and the return of extinguished fear are compromised in adolescents. However, findings have been inconclusive as there is a lack of fear extinction and extinction retention studies including children, adolescents and adults. In the present study, 36 children (6-9 years), 40 adolescents (13-17 years) and 44 adults (30-40 years), underwent a two-day fear conditioning task. Habituation, acquisition, and extinction were performed on the first day and an extinction retention test > 24 h later. Skin conductance responses were recorded during all phases of fear conditioning and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was conducted during the fear retention test. All groups acquired and extinguished fear as measured with SCR, with no group differences in SCR during extinction retention. The groups had largely similar neural fear responses during the retention test, apart from adolescents displaying stronger amygdala fear response than children, with no differences between adolescents and adults. The findings do not support an adolescent extinction dip, and there was only marginal evidence of progressive changes in fear conditioning across development. In contrast to findings in rodents, fear conditioning in humans may elicit similar physiological responses and recruit similar neural networks from childhood to adulthood.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101509
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fear extinction retention in children, adolescents, and adults

Ebba Widegren, Matilda A. Frick, Andreas Frick, Malin Gingnell et al.
9 citations
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
Memory and Neural Mechanisms
12.88
article

Fear extinction retention in children, adolescents, and adults

Ebba Widegren, Matilda A. Frick, Andreas Frick, Malin Gingnell, Olof Hjorth, Johan R. Vegelius, David Fällmar, Johan Lundin Kleberg, Johanna M. Hoppe, Karin C. Brocki, Arun K. Roy, Daniel S. Pine, Stefan Möller
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Past results suggest that fear extinction and the return of extinguished fear are compromised in adolescents. However, findings have been inconclusive as there is a lack of fear extinction and extinction retention studies including children, adolescents and adults. In the present study, 36 children (6-9 years), 40 adolescents (13-17 years) and 44 adults (30-40 years), underwent a two-day fear conditioning task. Habituation, acquisition, and extinction were performed on the first day and an extinction retention test > 24 h later. Skin conductance responses were recorded during all phases of fear conditioning and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was conducted during the fear retention test. All groups acquired and extinguished fear as measured with SCR, with no group differences in SCR during extinction retention. The groups had largely similar neural fear responses during the retention test, apart from adolescents displaying stronger amygdala fear response than children, with no differences between adolescents and adults. The findings do not support an adolescent extinction dip, and there was only marginal evidence of progressive changes in fear conditioning across development. In contrast to findings in rodents, fear conditioning in humans may elicit similar physiological responses and recruit similar neural networks from childhood to adulthood.

Developmental Cognitive NeuroscienceVol. 71
Uppsala University (SE), Uppsala University Hospital (SE), Stockholm University (SE), Lund University (SE), National Institute of Mental Health (US)
Svenska Sällskapet för Medicinsk Forskning, Hjärnfonden, Vetenskapsrådet, Riksbankens Jubileumsfond, Kjell och Märta Beijers Stiftelse, Uppsala Universitet, National Institute of Mental Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Memory and Neural Mechanisms
12.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.