Artificial intelligence as an automated essay scoring tool: A focus on ChatGPT

This study explores the effectiveness of using ChatGPT, an Artificial Intelligence (AI) language model, as an Automated Essay Scoring (AES) tool for grading English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ essays. The corpus consists of 50 essays representing various types including analysis, compare and contrast, descriptive, narrative, and opinion essays written by 10 EFL learners at the B2 level. Human raters and ChatGPT (4o mini version) scored the essays using the International English Language Testing System (IELTS) TASK 2 Writing band descriptors. Adopting a quantitative approach, the Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and Spearman correlation tests were employed to compare the scores generated, revealing a significant difference between the two methods of scoring, with human raters assigning higher scores than ChatGPT. Similarly, significant differences with varying degrees were also evident for each of the various types of essays, suggesting that the genre of the essays was not a parameter affecting the agreement between human raters and ChatGPT. After all, it was discussed that while ChatGPT shows promise as an AES tool, the observed disparities suggest that it has not reached sufficient proficiency for practical use. The study emphasizes the need for improvements in AI language models to meet the nuanced nature of essay evaluation in EFL contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1517994
Citations
16
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence as an automated essay scoring tool: A focus on ChatGPT

Ahmet Can Uyar, Dilek Büyükahıska
16 citations
International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
10.47
article

Artificial intelligence as an automated essay scoring tool: A focus on ChatGPT

Ahmet Can Uyar, Dilek Büyükahıska
article en
16 citations

Abstract

This study explores the effectiveness of using ChatGPT, an Artificial Intelligence (AI) language model, as an Automated Essay Scoring (AES) tool for grading English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ essays. The corpus consists of 50 essays representing various types including analysis, compare and contrast, descriptive, narrative, and opinion essays written by 10 EFL learners at the B2 level. Human raters and ChatGPT (4o mini version) scored the essays using the International English Language Testing System (IELTS) TASK 2 Writing band descriptors. Adopting a quantitative approach, the Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and Spearman correlation tests were employed to compare the scores generated, revealing a significant difference between the two methods of scoring, with human raters assigning higher scores than ChatGPT. Similarly, significant differences with varying degrees were also evident for each of the various types of essays, suggesting that the genre of the essays was not a parameter affecting the agreement between human raters and ChatGPT. After all, it was discussed that while ChatGPT shows promise as an AES tool, the observed disparities suggest that it has not reached sufficient proficiency for practical use. The study emphasizes the need for improvements in AI language models to meet the nuanced nature of essay evaluation in EFL contexts.

International Journal of Assessment Tools in EducationVol. 12(1)
Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi (TR), Ondokuz Mayıs University (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
10.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.