Validity and reliability study of metacognitive listening strategies teaching self-efficacy scale for teachers

In this study, an attempt was made to develop a valid and reliable measurement tool to determine teachers' self-efficacy levels for teaching metacognitive listening strategies. The study group consisted of 205 teachers for EFA and 248 teachers for CFA. As a result of the analyzes, a scale consisting of 16 items with 4 factors was developed. It was determined that the scale explained 74.10 of the total variances. For EFA, Kaiser-Mayer-Olkin (KMO) test, Barlett test, total variance, item-total correlation, common factor variance, factor loadings, χ2/df RMSEA, SRMR, RMR, NFI, NNFI, CFI, GFI, AGFI, IFI, RFI, CR, AVE, MSV and ASV values and Cronbach Alpha statistics were performed. The KMO value of the scale is 0.915, the result of Barlett's Test of Sphericity is significant (p=0.000) and the Cronbach Alpha value is 0.932. Five of the fit indices showed excellent fit and six of them showed acceptable fit. The CR, AVE, MSV and ASV values showed that it provided divergent and convergent validity. After the analysis, it was concluded that the Self-Efficacy Scale for Teaching Metacognitive Listening Strategies for Teachers is valid and reliable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1403112
Primary Topic
Communication in Education and Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validity and reliability study of metacognitive listening strategies teaching self-efficacy scale for teachers

Şafak Uluçınar Sağır, Murat Ermiş
1 links
International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education
Communication in Education and Healthcare
article

Validity and reliability study of metacognitive listening strategies teaching self-efficacy scale for teachers

Şafak Uluçınar Sağır, Murat Ermiş
article en

Abstract

In this study, an attempt was made to develop a valid and reliable measurement tool to determine teachers' self-efficacy levels for teaching metacognitive listening strategies. The study group consisted of 205 teachers for EFA and 248 teachers for CFA. As a result of the analyzes, a scale consisting of 16 items with 4 factors was developed. It was determined that the scale explained 74.10 of the total variances. For EFA, Kaiser-Mayer-Olkin (KMO) test, Barlett test, total variance, item-total correlation, common factor variance, factor loadings, χ2/df RMSEA, SRMR, RMR, NFI, NNFI, CFI, GFI, AGFI, IFI, RFI, CR, AVE, MSV and ASV values and Cronbach Alpha statistics were performed. The KMO value of the scale is 0.915, the result of Barlett's Test of Sphericity is significant (p=0.000) and the Cronbach Alpha value is 0.932. Five of the fit indices showed excellent fit and six of them showed acceptable fit. The CR, AVE, MSV and ASV values showed that it provided divergent and convergent validity. After the analysis, it was concluded that the Self-Efficacy Scale for Teaching Metacognitive Listening Strategies for Teachers is valid and reliable.

International Journal of Assessment Tools in EducationVol. 12(1)
Amasya Üniversitesi (TR)
Amasya Üniversitesi
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Communication in Education and Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Validity and reliability study of metacognitive listening strategies teaching self-efficacy scale for teachers — Şafak Uluçınar Sağır, Murat Ermiş · International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS