Comparative study on setup accuracy of marker-less surface-guided radiation therapy versus traditional skin marks in hypofractionated whole breast irradiation: A marker-free approach starting from CT simulation

To evaluate the setup accuracy of surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) compared with traditional skin marks in patients undergoing hypofractionated whole breast irradiation, with a specific focus on our institution's practice of full eliminating skin marks from the computed tomography (CT) simulation. We retrospectively reviewed 184 breast cancer patients treated with hypofractionated whole breast irradiation between January 2022 and May 2023. Initial patient positioning was performed using either traditional skin marks (n = 93, 1488 sessions) or surface-guidance technology via AlignRT (n = 91, 1456 sessions). The setup accuracy was evaluated by analyzing translational couch shifts in vertical, longitudinal, and lateral directions through daily verification using orthogonal kV images in anterior-posterior and lateral directions obtained after initial positioning. The time from initial patient positioning to treatment was also compared. The average translational couch shifts after initial positioning with skin marks were 3.2 ± 1.8 mm, 3.3 ± 1.5 mm, and 2.8 ± 1.4 mm in the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral directions, respectively. For SGRT, the average translational couch shifts were 3.5 ± 1.5 mm, 3.3 ± 1.4 mm, and 2.8 ± 1.2 mm, respectively. There were no significant differences between SGRT and skin marks in any direction. The average time from initial patient positioning to treatment was shorter in patients with SGRT compared to those with skin marks, 261 s vs. 281 s. The elimination of skin marks from the CT simulation stage, facilitated by SGRT, resulted in comparable setup accuracy with traditional skin marks. In addition, SGRT significantly reduced the time from initial patient positioning to treatment, suggesting that SGRT can be effectively used in hypofractionated whole breast irradiation without the need for skin marks, potentially enhancing patient comfort and convenience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2025.101290
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative study on setup accuracy of marker-less surface-guided radiation therapy versus traditional skin marks in hypofractionated whole breast irradiation: A marker-free approach starting from CT simulation

Kang Kyoo Lee, Jeong Geun Oh, Jung Hoon Kim, Sun Rock Moon et al.
1 citations
Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
1.88
article

Comparative study on setup accuracy of marker-less surface-guided radiation therapy versus traditional skin marks in hypofractionated whole breast irradiation: A marker-free approach starting from CT simulation

Kang Kyoo Lee, Jeong Geun Oh, Jung Hoon Kim, Sun Rock Moon, Yuri Jeong
article en
1 citations

Abstract

To evaluate the setup accuracy of surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) compared with traditional skin marks in patients undergoing hypofractionated whole breast irradiation, with a specific focus on our institution's practice of full eliminating skin marks from the computed tomography (CT) simulation. We retrospectively reviewed 184 breast cancer patients treated with hypofractionated whole breast irradiation between January 2022 and May 2023. Initial patient positioning was performed using either traditional skin marks (n = 93, 1488 sessions) or surface-guidance technology via AlignRT (n = 91, 1456 sessions). The setup accuracy was evaluated by analyzing translational couch shifts in vertical, longitudinal, and lateral directions through daily verification using orthogonal kV images in anterior-posterior and lateral directions obtained after initial positioning. The time from initial patient positioning to treatment was also compared. The average translational couch shifts after initial positioning with skin marks were 3.2 ± 1.8 mm, 3.3 ± 1.5 mm, and 2.8 ± 1.4 mm in the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral directions, respectively. For SGRT, the average translational couch shifts were 3.5 ± 1.5 mm, 3.3 ± 1.4 mm, and 2.8 ± 1.2 mm, respectively. There were no significant differences between SGRT and skin marks in any direction. The average time from initial patient positioning to treatment was shorter in patients with SGRT compared to those with skin marks, 261 s vs. 281 s. The elimination of skin marks from the CT simulation stage, facilitated by SGRT, resulted in comparable setup accuracy with traditional skin marks. In addition, SGRT significantly reduced the time from initial patient positioning to treatment, suggesting that SGRT can be effectively used in hypofractionated whole breast irradiation without the need for skin marks, potentially enhancing patient comfort and convenience.

Journal of Radiation Research and Applied SciencesVol. 18(1)
Konyang University Hospital (KR), Wonkwang University (KR)
Wonkwang University
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.