The Mechanism of Proppant Transport during Flowback in Rough Fracture for Supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> Fracturing

Supercritical CO2 fracturing technology has shown great potential for enhancing the production in unconventional reservoirs. The uncertainty of proppant transport during flowback is a critical problem in fracturing operations, which can lead to adverse consequences such as partial flow channels blockage or even production interruption. Despite its significance, comprehensive studies of proppant transport during flowback are still limited. It is essential to clarify the mechanism of proppant transport during flowback in rough fractures for supercritical CO2 fracturing. A realistic rough fracture model is reconstructed, and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are conducted to track proppant movement during flowback. The whole process of supercritical CO2 fracturing is described, including the pumping stage, the fracture closure stage, and the subsequent flowback stage. The effects of flowback rate, proppant size, temperature, and fracture width on the support effect are discussed. The results show that flowback stage can be subdivided into two stages: translation push and tumbling creep. The motion of proppants initiates with translation push and subsequently shifts to tumbling creep. Proppant motion is predominantly controlled by the tumbling creep throughout the flowback stage. To obtain a stable sand bed, a wider initial fracture width before the flowback stage is required. The proppant sand bed with a higher fluid temperature or fracture width is more stable than the sand bed with a lower fluid temperature. The equilibrium sand bed length decreases due to enhanced drag force with the increase of flowback rate. In addition, large size proppant tailings can improve the stability of the proppant sand bed, while ensuring high fracture conductivity and increasing postfracturing productivity. These insights significantly enhance the understanding of the proppant transport mechanism during flowback, offering important guidance for supercritical CO2 fracturing processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy & Fuels
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c04888
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Mechanism of Proppant Transport during Flowback in Rough Fracture for Supercritical CO2 Fracturing

Yuanxiu Sun, Qiushi Zhang, Bo Dong, Xiuxia Li et al.
5 citations
Energy & Fuels
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
3.57
article

The Mechanism of Proppant Transport during Flowback in Rough Fracture for Supercritical CO2 Fracturing

Yuanxiu Sun, Qiushi Zhang, Bo Dong, Xiuxia Li, Liwei He, Nuerlanjiang Tuerhongbaiyi
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Supercritical CO2 fracturing technology has shown great potential for enhancing the production in unconventional reservoirs. The uncertainty of proppant transport during flowback is a critical problem in fracturing operations, which can lead to adverse consequences such as partial flow channels blockage or even production interruption. Despite its significance, comprehensive studies of proppant transport during flowback are still limited. It is essential to clarify the mechanism of proppant transport during flowback in rough fractures for supercritical CO2 fracturing. A realistic rough fracture model is reconstructed, and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are conducted to track proppant movement during flowback. The whole process of supercritical CO2 fracturing is described, including the pumping stage, the fracture closure stage, and the subsequent flowback stage. The effects of flowback rate, proppant size, temperature, and fracture width on the support effect are discussed. The results show that flowback stage can be subdivided into two stages: translation push and tumbling creep. The motion of proppants initiates with translation push and subsequently shifts to tumbling creep. Proppant motion is predominantly controlled by the tumbling creep throughout the flowback stage. To obtain a stable sand bed, a wider initial fracture width before the flowback stage is required. The proppant sand bed with a higher fluid temperature or fracture width is more stable than the sand bed with a lower fluid temperature. The equilibrium sand bed length decreases due to enhanced drag force with the increase of flowback rate. In addition, large size proppant tailings can improve the stability of the proppant sand bed, while ensuring high fracture conductivity and increasing postfracturing productivity. These insights significantly enhance the understanding of the proppant transport mechanism during flowback, offering important guidance for supercritical CO2 fracturing processes.

Energy & FuelsVol. 39(3)
Liaoning Shihua University (CN), Karamay Central Hospital of Xinjiang (CN)
Department of Education of Liaoning Province
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
3.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.