Distinct CSF proteomic signatures are associated with cognitive decline in A+T+ and A+T‐ individuals with MCI due to Alzheimer’s Disease

Abstract Background Individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) show variability in cognitive decline. Little is known about the underlying mechanisms, but these are likely to depend on tau levels. Using untargeted proteomics in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), we studied which processes were associated with cognitive decline in A+T‐ and A+T+ MCI individuals. Method We included 80 individuals from ADC (age 66±7.9 years, 28 (35%) women, 52 (66%) A+T+, 4.6±2 follow‐ups over 4.1±1.8 years). N=2323 CSF proteins were quantified at baseline using untargeted TMT LC‐MS/MS. We tested associations between each protein and 1) progression to dementia with Cox proportional hazard models and 2) decline over time on MMSE using linear mixed models with subject‐specific intercepts. All analyses were stratified for tau status and adjusted for age, sex and education. We performed enrichment analysis on proteins associated with cognitive decline. Result Both AT groups declined over time on MMSE, with steeper decline in A+T+ (A+T+ β±SE ‐0.99±0.08 p‐value<0.001, A+T‐ β±SE ‐0.39±0.09 p‐value<0.001, p‐value A+T‐ vs. A+T+ <0.001). Largely different groups of proteins predicted faster progression to dementia and steeper decline on MMSE in A+T+ (resp. n=119 and n=664, p‐values<0.05, Figure 1) compared with A+T‐ individuals (resp. n=88 and n=718, p‐values<0.05). In A+T+ higher levels of proteins associated with synaptic plasticity processes and extracellular matrix organization, and lower levels of proteins associated with immune system processes and lipid remodeling were associated with steeper cognitive decline. Conversely, in A+T‐ these processes were associated with slower cognitive decline. Furthermore, in A+T‐ proteins indicative of blood‐brain barrier (BBB) impairment were also associated with cognitive decline. Conclusion A+T+ and A+T‐ individuals with MCI show largely different proteomic signatures associated with cognitive decline. In A+T+ MCI individuals, higher levels of synaptic‐plasticity proteins and lower levels of immune‐related proteins were associated with faster cognitive decline, while in A+T‐ opposite effects were found. This suggest that treatments to slow cognitive decline in AD may need tailoring on tau status.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.090645
Primary Topic
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distinct CSF proteomic signatures are associated with cognitive decline in A+T+ and A+T‐ individuals with MCI due to Alzheimer’s Disease

Eleonora M. Vromen, Argonde C. van Harten, Pieter Jelle Visser, Betty Marije Tijms et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
article

Distinct CSF proteomic signatures are associated with cognitive decline in A+T+ and A+T‐ individuals with MCI due to Alzheimer’s Disease

Eleonora M. Vromen, Argonde C. van Harten, Pieter Jelle Visser, Betty Marije Tijms, Wiesje M. van der Flier, Charlotte Elisabeth Teunissen, Yolande A.L. Pijnenburg
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) show variability in cognitive decline. Little is known about the underlying mechanisms, but these are likely to depend on tau levels. Using untargeted proteomics in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), we studied which processes were associated with cognitive decline in A+T‐ and A+T+ MCI individuals. Method We included 80 individuals from ADC (age 66±7.9 years, 28 (35%) women, 52 (66%) A+T+, 4.6±2 follow‐ups over 4.1±1.8 years). N=2323 CSF proteins were quantified at baseline using untargeted TMT LC‐MS/MS. We tested associations between each protein and 1) progression to dementia with Cox proportional hazard models and 2) decline over time on MMSE using linear mixed models with subject‐specific intercepts. All analyses were stratified for tau status and adjusted for age, sex and education. We performed enrichment analysis on proteins associated with cognitive decline. Result Both AT groups declined over time on MMSE, with steeper decline in A+T+ (A+T+ β±SE ‐0.99±0.08 p‐value<0.001, A+T‐ β±SE ‐0.39±0.09 p‐value<0.001, p‐value A+T‐ vs. A+T+ <0.001). Largely different groups of proteins predicted faster progression to dementia and steeper decline on MMSE in A+T+ (resp. n=119 and n=664, p‐values<0.05, Figure 1) compared with A+T‐ individuals (resp. n=88 and n=718, p‐values<0.05). In A+T+ higher levels of proteins associated with synaptic plasticity processes and extracellular matrix organization, and lower levels of proteins associated with immune system processes and lipid remodeling were associated with steeper cognitive decline. Conversely, in A+T‐ these processes were associated with slower cognitive decline. Furthermore, in A+T‐ proteins indicative of blood‐brain barrier (BBB) impairment were also associated with cognitive decline. Conclusion A+T+ and A+T‐ individuals with MCI show largely different proteomic signatures associated with cognitive decline. In A+T+ MCI individuals, higher levels of synaptic‐plasticity proteins and lower levels of immune‐related proteins were associated with faster cognitive decline, while in A+T‐ opposite effects were found. This suggest that treatments to slow cognitive decline in AD may need tailoring on tau status.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Karolinska Institutet (SE), Maastricht University (NL), Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.