Gender Differences in the Predictive Efficacy of Mayo‐PACC for Alzheimer's Disease Biomarkers: Results from a South American Cohort

Abstract Background With the increase in life expectancy and the rising prevalence of Alzheimer's Disease (AD), the integration of biomarkers for early diagnosis is crucial. The Mayo Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite (Mayo‐PACC), encompassing the Rey‐Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), Trail Making Test ‐ B (TMT B), and semantic fluency, is designed to detect cognitive changes in preclinical AD. This study investigates gender‐based differences in the predictive efficacy of Mayo‐PACC for AD biomarkers following the ATN (Amyloid, Tau, Neurodegeneration) criteria. Method The study included 112 patients diagnosed with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), comprising 38% women and 61% men, matched by age (mean ± SD: 68.73 ± 10.70 years), education (14.21 ± 3.56 years), and cognitive performance (Mayo‐PACC p= 0.76). Neuropsychological assessments were conducted using the Mayo‐PACC, and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers (amyloid β1–42, total tau, and phosphorylated tau at threonine 181) were quantified by ELISA (Fujirebio, Japan). Biomarkers were dichotomized using cutoff values previously determined in our laboratory. Result Random Forest models indicated an overall area under the curve (AUC) of 0.67 for the Mayo‐PACC. In gender‐specific analyses, women showed a lower predictive capacity (AUC: 0.43), with TMT B (35.42%), RAVLT (32.84%), and semantic fluency (31.74%) as key predictors. For men, a higher AUC of 0.90 was observed, with TMT B (35.49%) and semantic fluency (34.91%) being the most influential. When examining individual ATN biomarkers, women showed an AUC of 0.25 for Aβ1‐42, 0.54 for N, and 0.40 for T, with RAVLT (40.51%) as a prominent feature. Men exhibited AUCs of 0.63 for Aβ1‐42, 0.83 for N, and 0.48 for T, with semantic fluency (33.95%), and RAVLT (33.12%) being significant predictors. Conclusion The study highlights notable gender differences in the predictive performance of neuropsychological composites for AD biomarkers. Biomarker prediction was more accurate in men. These findings suggest the importance of gender‐specific approaches in predictive modeling for AD diagnosis, underscoring the potential to enhance diagnostic precision in clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.091506
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender Differences in the Predictive Efficacy of Mayo‐PACC for Alzheimer's Disease Biomarkers: Results from a South American Cohort

Míriam J. Álvarez, Ezequiel Surace, Lucía Pertierra, Nicolás Corvalán et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Gender Differences in the Predictive Efficacy of Mayo‐PACC for Alzheimer's Disease Biomarkers: Results from a South American Cohort

Míriam J. Álvarez, Ezequiel Surace, Lucía Pertierra, Nicolás Corvalán, Giulia Solange Clas, Lucía Crivelli, Greta Keller, Ricardo Allegri, Gustavo Emilio Sevlever, Patricio Chrem Méndez
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background With the increase in life expectancy and the rising prevalence of Alzheimer's Disease (AD), the integration of biomarkers for early diagnosis is crucial. The Mayo Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite (Mayo‐PACC), encompassing the Rey‐Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), Trail Making Test ‐ B (TMT B), and semantic fluency, is designed to detect cognitive changes in preclinical AD. This study investigates gender‐based differences in the predictive efficacy of Mayo‐PACC for AD biomarkers following the ATN (Amyloid, Tau, Neurodegeneration) criteria. Method The study included 112 patients diagnosed with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), comprising 38% women and 61% men, matched by age (mean ± SD: 68.73 ± 10.70 years), education (14.21 ± 3.56 years), and cognitive performance (Mayo‐PACC p= 0.76). Neuropsychological assessments were conducted using the Mayo‐PACC, and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers (amyloid β1–42, total tau, and phosphorylated tau at threonine 181) were quantified by ELISA (Fujirebio, Japan). Biomarkers were dichotomized using cutoff values previously determined in our laboratory. Result Random Forest models indicated an overall area under the curve (AUC) of 0.67 for the Mayo‐PACC. In gender‐specific analyses, women showed a lower predictive capacity (AUC: 0.43), with TMT B (35.42%), RAVLT (32.84%), and semantic fluency (31.74%) as key predictors. For men, a higher AUC of 0.90 was observed, with TMT B (35.49%) and semantic fluency (34.91%) being the most influential. When examining individual ATN biomarkers, women showed an AUC of 0.25 for Aβ1‐42, 0.54 for N, and 0.40 for T, with RAVLT (40.51%) as a prominent feature. Men exhibited AUCs of 0.63 for Aβ1‐42, 0.83 for N, and 0.48 for T, with semantic fluency (33.95%), and RAVLT (33.12%) being significant predictors. Conclusion The study highlights notable gender differences in the predictive performance of neuropsychological composites for AD biomarkers. Biomarker prediction was more accurate in men. These findings suggest the importance of gender‐specific approaches in predictive modeling for AD diagnosis, underscoring the potential to enhance diagnostic precision in clinical practice.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Fundación para la Lucha contra las Enfermedades Neurológicas de la Infancia (AR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.