Comparison of Zakat Management Paradigms Between Indonesia and Malaysia

This study aims to compare the zakat management paradigms between Indonesia and Malaysia, focusing on recent developments from 2019 to 2024. Using a comparative analysis approach and systematic literature review, the study explores key aspects of zakat management in both countries, including legal and institutional frameworks, collection methods, distribution strategies. The results show significant differences in the approaches to zakat management between the two countries. Indonesia implements a centralized system under BAZNAS, while Malaysia adopts a decentralized approach at the state level. Malaysia shows higher collection efficiency through integration with the tax system, while Indonesia focuses more on voluntary compliance. Both countries show positive trends in the use of zakat for long-term development purposes, with Indonesia standing out in productive zakat initiatives and Malaysia in education and health support. The study concludes that despite differences in approach, both countries demonstrate a commitment to modernizing and optimizing their zakat management systems. Recommendations for future research include quantitative analysis of the impact of different paradigms on poverty alleviation and exploration of the potential for hybrid models that combine the strengths of centralized and decentralized systems.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JURNAL PENDIDIKAN IPS
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37630/jpi.v14i2.2184
Primary Topic
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Zakat Management Paradigms Between Indonesia and Malaysia

Ayu Rosita Anggraini
JURNAL PENDIDIKAN IPS
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
article

Comparison of Zakat Management Paradigms Between Indonesia and Malaysia

Ayu Rosita Anggraini
article en

Abstract

This study aims to compare the zakat management paradigms between Indonesia and Malaysia, focusing on recent developments from 2019 to 2024. Using a comparative analysis approach and systematic literature review, the study explores key aspects of zakat management in both countries, including legal and institutional frameworks, collection methods, distribution strategies. The results show significant differences in the approaches to zakat management between the two countries. Indonesia implements a centralized system under BAZNAS, while Malaysia adopts a decentralized approach at the state level. Malaysia shows higher collection efficiency through integration with the tax system, while Indonesia focuses more on voluntary compliance. Both countries show positive trends in the use of zakat for long-term development purposes, with Indonesia standing out in productive zakat initiatives and Malaysia in education and health support. The study concludes that despite differences in approach, both countries demonstrate a commitment to modernizing and optimizing their zakat management systems. Recommendations for future research include quantitative analysis of the impact of different paradigms on poverty alleviation and exploration of the potential for hybrid models that combine the strengths of centralized and decentralized systems.

JURNAL PENDIDIKAN IPSVol. 14(2)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.