Head‐to‐head comparison of four different plasma p‐tau217 assays to detect brain amyloid pathology and cognitive decline in diverse population‐based cohorts

Abstract Background Plasma p‐tau217 is a highly promising biomarker for detecting Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology. However, it is unclear how p‐tau217 assays from different sources perform compared to one another. Moreover, studies in diverse cohorts and population‐based settings are limited. We performed a direct comparison of four different p‐tau217 assays to detect brain amyloid‐beta (Aβ) deposition or cognitive decline. Method We included n=427 participants from three separate cohorts from southwestern Pennsylvania, USA. Cohort‐1 was the Monongahela‐Youghiogheny Health Aging Team (MYHAT, n=87, median age 83 [IQR: 78‐87.5], 74% female), an ongoing population‐based cohort drawn from a medically and economically underserved Rust Belt region. Cohort‐2 was the MYHAT‐NI sub‐study (n=111, median age 76 [IQR: 72‐80], 54% female), which performed two‐year longitudinal follow‐up neuroimaging assessments of Aβ, tau, and neurodegeneration by structural MRI. Cohort‐3 was the Human Connectome Project (HCP, n=229, median age 62 [IQR: 56‐70], 65% female) which targeted a 50:50 split of self‐identified Black and non‐Hispanic White individuals. Plasma p‐tau217 was measured using assays from four different sources: University of Pittsburgh (UPitt), ALZpath, University of Gothenburg (UGOT), and NULISA from Alamar Biosciences. Aβ positivity was defined as a mean SUVR > 1.346. Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) and Mini Mental State Examination were used to assess cognitive performance. Result In the MYHAT‐NI cohort, three p‐tau217 assays—UPitt, ALZpath, and NULISA—were employed. The assays demonstrated equivalent AUCs for determining Aβ positivity, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90. UPitt and ALZpath assays also showed similar AUCs in the HCP cohorts, with values of 0.87 and 0.90, respectively. In MYHAT, the UGOT and ALZpath assays separated CDR=0 and CDR=0.5 participants with equivalent AUCs (0.79 vs. 0.81). Significant correlations were observed in all inter‐assay comparisons, with Pearson correlation between assays ranging between 0.40 and 0.86. Conclusion We observed largely equivalent performances of plasma p‐tau217 assays in predicting amyloid positivity and cognitive impairment across three diverse cohorts of community‐dwelling older adults.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.092871
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Head‐to‐head comparison of four different plasma p‐tau217 assays to detect brain amyloid pathology and cognitive decline in diverse population‐based cohorts

Tharick Ali Pascoal, Óscar López, Xuemei Zeng, Guilherme Povala et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Head‐to‐head comparison of four different plasma p‐tau217 assays to detect brain amyloid pathology and cognitive decline in diverse population‐based cohorts

Tharick Ali Pascoal, Óscar López, Xuemei Zeng, Guilherme Povala, Ann D. Cohen, Kaj Blennow, Fernando González‐Ortiz, William E. Klunk, Pâmela C.L. Ferreira, Anuradha Sehrawat, Beth E. Snitz, Thomas K. Karikari, Victor L. Villemagne, Bruna Bellaver, Rebecca A. Deek, Wasiu Gbolahan Balogun, M. Ilyas Kamboh, Tara K Lafferty, Yijun Chen, Mary Ganguli, Henrik Zetterberg
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Plasma p‐tau217 is a highly promising biomarker for detecting Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology. However, it is unclear how p‐tau217 assays from different sources perform compared to one another. Moreover, studies in diverse cohorts and population‐based settings are limited. We performed a direct comparison of four different p‐tau217 assays to detect brain amyloid‐beta (Aβ) deposition or cognitive decline. Method We included n=427 participants from three separate cohorts from southwestern Pennsylvania, USA. Cohort‐1 was the Monongahela‐Youghiogheny Health Aging Team (MYHAT, n=87, median age 83 [IQR: 78‐87.5], 74% female), an ongoing population‐based cohort drawn from a medically and economically underserved Rust Belt region. Cohort‐2 was the MYHAT‐NI sub‐study (n=111, median age 76 [IQR: 72‐80], 54% female), which performed two‐year longitudinal follow‐up neuroimaging assessments of Aβ, tau, and neurodegeneration by structural MRI. Cohort‐3 was the Human Connectome Project (HCP, n=229, median age 62 [IQR: 56‐70], 65% female) which targeted a 50:50 split of self‐identified Black and non‐Hispanic White individuals. Plasma p‐tau217 was measured using assays from four different sources: University of Pittsburgh (UPitt), ALZpath, University of Gothenburg (UGOT), and NULISA from Alamar Biosciences. Aβ positivity was defined as a mean SUVR > 1.346. Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) and Mini Mental State Examination were used to assess cognitive performance. Result In the MYHAT‐NI cohort, three p‐tau217 assays—UPitt, ALZpath, and NULISA—were employed. The assays demonstrated equivalent AUCs for determining Aβ positivity, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90. UPitt and ALZpath assays also showed similar AUCs in the HCP cohorts, with values of 0.87 and 0.90, respectively. In MYHAT, the UGOT and ALZpath assays separated CDR=0 and CDR=0.5 participants with equivalent AUCs (0.79 vs. 0.81). Significant correlations were observed in all inter‐assay comparisons, with Pearson correlation between assays ranging between 0.40 and 0.86. Conclusion We observed largely equivalent performances of plasma p‐tau217 assays in predicting amyloid positivity and cognitive impairment across three diverse cohorts of community‐dwelling older adults.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
University of Pittsburgh (US), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.