The Role of Blood‐Based Proteomic Biomarkers in Sleep Spindle‐Slow Oscillation Coupling and Incident Dementia

Abstract Background Sleep is impaired in dementia. Therefore, sleep has been proposed as an intervention target for incident dementia. The microstructures of sleep electroencephalography (EEG), such as spindle, slow oscillation (SO), and their coupling, have neuronal bases and functions in learning and memory. Higher spindle‐SO coupling is linked to lower risk of incident dementia in epidemiological studies. Here, we aim to use proteomics to explore the molecular basis of this link. Method This retrospective study used the Framingham Heart Study (FHS) Offspring and OMNI 1 Cohorts, accessible through BioLINCC. The inclusion criteria are (1) plasma proteomics available, where the blood was drawn at FHS‐Exam5 and profiled using SOMAscan (1373 proteins); (2) sleep EEGs from the Sleep Heart Health Study on National Sleep Research Resources obtained at FHS‐Exam6. The exclusion criteria are (1) missing covariates: age, sex, education, APOE ε4 allele, body mass index, and smoking; (2) pre‐existing dementia before sleep recording. Spindle‐SO coupling was defined as the fraction of spindles within SO at N2 or N3 stages of sleep, detected using Luna. Incident dementia was based on FHS consensus. We performed a proteome‐wide association study (PWAS) for spindle‐SO coupling using Spearman’s correlation. We also performed PWAS for incident dementia using Fine‐Gray survival analysis with death as competing risk. We then found the common proteins between the two PWASes. Since the proteins were from the blood, we filtered them by assessing their blood‐brain expression correlations using Genotype‐Tissue Expression. Result The PWAS for incident dementia had n=1048 (52% female) with maximum 47‐year follow‐up, revealing 35 proteins reaching Bonferroni‐corrected significance. In contrast, the PWAS for spindle‐SO coupling had n=146 (57% female), with no Bonferroni‐corrected significance. There were 28 proteins common to both PWASes before Bonferroni correction. Among them, intercellular adhesion molecule 2 (ICAM2), C‐reactive protein, and myoglobin demonstrated significant blood‐brain correlations, with ICAM2 exhibiting brain‐wide expression (Figure 1). One standard deviation increase in ICAM2 is associated with hazard ratio of 0.48 (95% confidence interval 0.23‐0.99, p=0.048) for incident dementia. ICAM2 and spindle‐SO coupling have Spearman’s correlation at 0.24 (0.08‐0.39, p=0.0036). Conclusion ICAM2 may serve as the proteomic basis for the association between spindle‐SO coupling and incident dementia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.089218
Primary Topic
Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Blood‐Based Proteomic Biomarkers in Sleep Spindle‐Slow Oscillation Coupling and Incident Dementia

Prasenjit Mondal, Haoqi Sun, Bruno A. Benítez, Zizhuo Chen et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Sleep and Wakefulness Research
article

The Role of Blood‐Based Proteomic Biomarkers in Sleep Spindle‐Slow Oscillation Coupling and Incident Dementia

Prasenjit Mondal, Haoqi Sun, Bruno A. Benítez, Zizhuo Chen, Can Zhang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Sleep is impaired in dementia. Therefore, sleep has been proposed as an intervention target for incident dementia. The microstructures of sleep electroencephalography (EEG), such as spindle, slow oscillation (SO), and their coupling, have neuronal bases and functions in learning and memory. Higher spindle‐SO coupling is linked to lower risk of incident dementia in epidemiological studies. Here, we aim to use proteomics to explore the molecular basis of this link. Method This retrospective study used the Framingham Heart Study (FHS) Offspring and OMNI 1 Cohorts, accessible through BioLINCC. The inclusion criteria are (1) plasma proteomics available, where the blood was drawn at FHS‐Exam5 and profiled using SOMAscan (1373 proteins); (2) sleep EEGs from the Sleep Heart Health Study on National Sleep Research Resources obtained at FHS‐Exam6. The exclusion criteria are (1) missing covariates: age, sex, education, APOE ε4 allele, body mass index, and smoking; (2) pre‐existing dementia before sleep recording. Spindle‐SO coupling was defined as the fraction of spindles within SO at N2 or N3 stages of sleep, detected using Luna. Incident dementia was based on FHS consensus. We performed a proteome‐wide association study (PWAS) for spindle‐SO coupling using Spearman’s correlation. We also performed PWAS for incident dementia using Fine‐Gray survival analysis with death as competing risk. We then found the common proteins between the two PWASes. Since the proteins were from the blood, we filtered them by assessing their blood‐brain expression correlations using Genotype‐Tissue Expression. Result The PWAS for incident dementia had n=1048 (52% female) with maximum 47‐year follow‐up, revealing 35 proteins reaching Bonferroni‐corrected significance. In contrast, the PWAS for spindle‐SO coupling had n=146 (57% female), with no Bonferroni‐corrected significance. There were 28 proteins common to both PWASes before Bonferroni correction. Among them, intercellular adhesion molecule 2 (ICAM2), C‐reactive protein, and myoglobin demonstrated significant blood‐brain correlations, with ICAM2 exhibiting brain‐wide expression (Figure 1). One standard deviation increase in ICAM2 is associated with hazard ratio of 0.48 (95% confidence interval 0.23‐0.99, p=0.048) for incident dementia. ICAM2 and spindle‐SO coupling have Spearman’s correlation at 0.24 (0.08‐0.39, p=0.0036). Conclusion ICAM2 may serve as the proteomic basis for the association between spindle‐SO coupling and incident dementia.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Boston Latin Academy (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Sleep and Wakefulness Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.