Acceptance of using digital technologies to aid the timely detection of dementia: perspectives from Boston University Alzheimer’s Disease Research Centre

Abstract Background Using digital technologies to detect the early signs of dementia‐causing diseases could improve the timely detection of these diseases. To support this approach, we explored users’ perspectives on the acceptability of using a variety of digital technologies. Method A sub‐group of participants from Boston University’s Alzheimer’s Disease Research Centre were recruited. Participants used up to nine study technologies (active smartphone apps (n=3), passive apps (n=2), wrist worn activity monitor (n=2), EEG headband (n=1), Oximeter ring (n=1)) for two weeks, every three‐months, over a year. Semi‐structured interviews were conducted after the first two weeks. A framework thematic analysis approach was applied to the interview transcripts, assisted by N‐Vivo (QSR, version 14.23.2). The Technology Acceptance Model (1) aided in refining key themes. Result Twenty‐four individuals were interviewed: 13 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and 11 without cognitive impairments. Three key themes emerged; perceived usefulness, intention to use and enjoyment of use. Participants were excited about the possibility of using digital technologies to remotely monitor their brain health, but some raised concerns that this could reduce personal interaction with their healthcare professional. Participants with pre‐existing health conditions, questioned the accuracy of the technology. For example, a participant wondered what effect an oxygen mask used for sleep apnoea would have on the data collected from the oximeter ring, reducing their perceived usefulness of the devices. Many participants using seven or more devices reflected on the burden of using multiple devices, finding it was challenging to familiarise themselves with them and then remember to use them all. Participants with MCI enjoyed the cognitive stimulation they felt after using the gamified cognitive tasks in the active smartphone apps, whereas participants without cognitive impairment wanted more variety to improve engagement. Conclusion Results highlight the acceptability of a variety of digital technologies for the timely detection of dementia‐causing diseases and discussed the burden of using multiple devices. Future research should explore how pre‐existing health conditions could affect the accuracy of digital technologies to improve real world applicability. References Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly. 1989 Sep 1:319‐40.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.089699
Primary Topic
Technology Use by Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acceptance of using digital technologies to aid the timely detection of dementia: perspectives from Boston University Alzheimer’s Disease Research Centre

Spencer Low, Zachary Popp, Sarah P. Slight, Clare Tolley et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Technology Use by Older Adults
article

Acceptance of using digital technologies to aid the timely detection of dementia: perspectives from Boston University Alzheimer’s Disease Research Centre

Spencer Low, Zachary Popp, Sarah P. Slight, Clare Tolley, Sarah Wilson, Emily Beswick, Raiyan R. Khan, Salman Rahman
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Using digital technologies to detect the early signs of dementia‐causing diseases could improve the timely detection of these diseases. To support this approach, we explored users’ perspectives on the acceptability of using a variety of digital technologies. Method A sub‐group of participants from Boston University’s Alzheimer’s Disease Research Centre were recruited. Participants used up to nine study technologies (active smartphone apps (n=3), passive apps (n=2), wrist worn activity monitor (n=2), EEG headband (n=1), Oximeter ring (n=1)) for two weeks, every three‐months, over a year. Semi‐structured interviews were conducted after the first two weeks. A framework thematic analysis approach was applied to the interview transcripts, assisted by N‐Vivo (QSR, version 14.23.2). The Technology Acceptance Model (1) aided in refining key themes. Result Twenty‐four individuals were interviewed: 13 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and 11 without cognitive impairments. Three key themes emerged; perceived usefulness, intention to use and enjoyment of use. Participants were excited about the possibility of using digital technologies to remotely monitor their brain health, but some raised concerns that this could reduce personal interaction with their healthcare professional. Participants with pre‐existing health conditions, questioned the accuracy of the technology. For example, a participant wondered what effect an oxygen mask used for sleep apnoea would have on the data collected from the oximeter ring, reducing their perceived usefulness of the devices. Many participants using seven or more devices reflected on the burden of using multiple devices, finding it was challenging to familiarise themselves with them and then remember to use them all. Participants with MCI enjoyed the cognitive stimulation they felt after using the gamified cognitive tasks in the active smartphone apps, whereas participants without cognitive impairment wanted more variety to improve engagement. Conclusion Results highlight the acceptability of a variety of digital technologies for the timely detection of dementia‐causing diseases and discussed the burden of using multiple devices. Future research should explore how pre‐existing health conditions could affect the accuracy of digital technologies to improve real world applicability. References Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly. 1989 Sep 1:319‐40.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Boston University (US), Newcastle University (GB), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Technology Use by Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.