Investigating the relationships between cognitive impairment score, cerebrospinal fluid measures and dementia diagnosis

Abstract Background Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dementia markers are sensitive to cognitive decline, particularly memory (Hosseini et al, 2023). Methods We performed preliminary analyses on a neurodegenerative and non‐neurodegenerative patient dataset, collected as part of the CogNID study (IRAS reference: 250525, clinical trial reference: NCT03861884). We explore two questions, the first of which regards whether cognitive profile measured by the Addenbrooke’s cognitive examination (ACE‐R III) can predict diagnosis category, clustered into three groups: 1) Alzheimer’s Disease (AD; N=50), 2) non‐AD dementia conditions (e.g., frontotemporal dementia, Vascular Cognitive Impairment, Parkinson’s disease; N=46), and 3) a mixed, non‐dementia group serving as “control” (e.g., subjective cognitive impairment, post‐Covid‐19 brain fog; N=64). The second question asked whether, for a smaller subset of our participants with CSF dementia measures, there is any correlation between CSF dementia biomarkers and cognitive impairment. We explored these using regression analysis and Pearson’s correlation tests. Results For our total sample with recorded ACE‐R III scores (N=160, M age =59.3, SD age =6.4), participants’ memory (t=‐2.31, p=.02) and language (t=2.16, p =.03) scores predicted their diagnosis category. Post‐hoc split‐data regression analyses revealed only a significantly lower memory score for the AD group compared to control group (t=‐2.482, p=.015). None of the other comparisons showed a significant difference after multiple‐comparisons corrections. For our second question, we selected a subsample of our data with recorded CSF measures (N=56). We assessed the CSF measures of total 181‐Tau, phospho‐Tau and Amyloidß 1‐42 in these participants in relation to their memory, attention and visuospatial, obtained from the ACE‐R III scores. We found a significant negative correlation between 181‐phospho‐Tau (but not total Tau) and memory scores (r=‐.37, p=.005), indicating that higher 181‐phospho‐Tau measures were significantly associated with impaired memory performance. Conclusions The preliminary analysis is limited by the high diversity of our neurodegenerative non‐AD group. A more detailed exploration of memory is crucial during diagnostic assessments of suspected AD. Disclosure and funding : AAH is funded by the UK Medical Research Council (MR/T005580/1). Reference : https://alz‐journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/alz.054530

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.088365
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the relationships between cognitive impairment score, cerebrospinal fluid measures and dementia diagnosis

Elizabeta B. Mukaetova‐Ladinska, Zlatomira G. Ilchovska, Akram A. Hosseini, JeYoung Jung
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Investigating the relationships between cognitive impairment score, cerebrospinal fluid measures and dementia diagnosis

Elizabeta B. Mukaetova‐Ladinska, Zlatomira G. Ilchovska, Akram A. Hosseini, JeYoung Jung
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dementia markers are sensitive to cognitive decline, particularly memory (Hosseini et al, 2023). Methods We performed preliminary analyses on a neurodegenerative and non‐neurodegenerative patient dataset, collected as part of the CogNID study (IRAS reference: 250525, clinical trial reference: NCT03861884). We explore two questions, the first of which regards whether cognitive profile measured by the Addenbrooke’s cognitive examination (ACE‐R III) can predict diagnosis category, clustered into three groups: 1) Alzheimer’s Disease (AD; N=50), 2) non‐AD dementia conditions (e.g., frontotemporal dementia, Vascular Cognitive Impairment, Parkinson’s disease; N=46), and 3) a mixed, non‐dementia group serving as “control” (e.g., subjective cognitive impairment, post‐Covid‐19 brain fog; N=64). The second question asked whether, for a smaller subset of our participants with CSF dementia measures, there is any correlation between CSF dementia biomarkers and cognitive impairment. We explored these using regression analysis and Pearson’s correlation tests. Results For our total sample with recorded ACE‐R III scores (N=160, M age =59.3, SD age =6.4), participants’ memory (t=‐2.31, p=.02) and language (t=2.16, p =.03) scores predicted their diagnosis category. Post‐hoc split‐data regression analyses revealed only a significantly lower memory score for the AD group compared to control group (t=‐2.482, p=.015). None of the other comparisons showed a significant difference after multiple‐comparisons corrections. For our second question, we selected a subsample of our data with recorded CSF measures (N=56). We assessed the CSF measures of total 181‐Tau, phospho‐Tau and Amyloidß 1‐42 in these participants in relation to their memory, attention and visuospatial, obtained from the ACE‐R III scores. We found a significant negative correlation between 181‐phospho‐Tau (but not total Tau) and memory scores (r=‐.37, p=.005), indicating that higher 181‐phospho‐Tau measures were significantly associated with impaired memory performance. Conclusions The preliminary analysis is limited by the high diversity of our neurodegenerative non‐AD group. A more detailed exploration of memory is crucial during diagnostic assessments of suspected AD. Disclosure and funding : AAH is funded by the UK Medical Research Council (MR/T005580/1). Reference : https://alz‐journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/alz.054530

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), University of Nottingham (GB), University of Leicester (GB), Queen's Medical Centre (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.