The cross‐sectional association of White Matter Hyperintensities, CAIDE Dementia Risk Score, and cognition in Mexican American elders from the HABS‐HD Study

Abstract Background Associations between CAIDE scores and white matter hyperintensities (WMH) have been reported, and research have shown that both can impact cognition. The cognitive correlates of high CAIDE scores and WMH load in minorities like Mexican Americans (MA) remain unclear. Method Cognitively normal MA from the Health and Aging Brain Study (HABS‐HD) (n = 112), were classified as high or low risk for dementia according to a CAIDE cutoff score of 9. WMH volume was measured from FLAIR using the Statistical Parametric Mapping Lesion Segmentation Tool. After comparing global cognition, memory, executive function (EF), verbal fluency, and processing speed (PS) scores between groups, generalized linear models were used to explore the associations of WMH, CAIDE score and cognition. To better understand the association of WMH and CAIDE score with cognitive performance, we conducted a mediation analysis using PROCESS Macro (Hayes 2013). Age, sex, and education were entered as covariates in the models. Result Participants in the high‐risk group were older, less educated, and had lower scores in all cognitive measures. CAIDE score was not associated with any cognitive measures. WMH were associated with memory (B = ‐.14, p <0.001), EF (B = ‐.13, p = .002), and PS (B = .89, p = .02), and the three measures were also associated with the interaction high risk x WMH. In mediation analysis, the regression of WMH on the mediator, CAIDE, was significant (b = ‐.57, p <.001). The analysis showed that the mediator (CAIDE), controlling for WMH, was significant for executive function (b = ‐.09, p <0.001), and processing speed (b = ‐.03, p = .002). The analyses also revealed that, controlling for the mediator (CAIDE), WMH was still a significant predictor of executive function (b = ‐.18, p <0.001), and processing speed (b = ‐.15, p <0.001), but the effects were smaller. Conclusion These results suggest that MA with higher WMH perform worse in measures of executive function and processing speed, and that association is partially mediated by higher CAIDE scores. Further studies are needed to investigate if cognitive performance in normal individuals with WMH and high CAIDE scores.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.089499
Primary Topic
Nutritional Studies and Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The cross‐sectional association of White Matter Hyperintensities, CAIDE Dementia Risk Score, and cognition in Mexican American elders from the HABS‐HD Study

Raul Vintimilla
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Nutritional Studies and Diet
article

The cross‐sectional association of White Matter Hyperintensities, CAIDE Dementia Risk Score, and cognition in Mexican American elders from the HABS‐HD Study

Raul Vintimilla
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Associations between CAIDE scores and white matter hyperintensities (WMH) have been reported, and research have shown that both can impact cognition. The cognitive correlates of high CAIDE scores and WMH load in minorities like Mexican Americans (MA) remain unclear. Method Cognitively normal MA from the Health and Aging Brain Study (HABS‐HD) (n = 112), were classified as high or low risk for dementia according to a CAIDE cutoff score of 9. WMH volume was measured from FLAIR using the Statistical Parametric Mapping Lesion Segmentation Tool. After comparing global cognition, memory, executive function (EF), verbal fluency, and processing speed (PS) scores between groups, generalized linear models were used to explore the associations of WMH, CAIDE score and cognition. To better understand the association of WMH and CAIDE score with cognitive performance, we conducted a mediation analysis using PROCESS Macro (Hayes 2013). Age, sex, and education were entered as covariates in the models. Result Participants in the high‐risk group were older, less educated, and had lower scores in all cognitive measures. CAIDE score was not associated with any cognitive measures. WMH were associated with memory (B = ‐.14, p <0.001), EF (B = ‐.13, p = .002), and PS (B = .89, p = .02), and the three measures were also associated with the interaction high risk x WMH. In mediation analysis, the regression of WMH on the mediator, CAIDE, was significant (b = ‐.57, p <.001). The analysis showed that the mediator (CAIDE), controlling for WMH, was significant for executive function (b = ‐.09, p <0.001), and processing speed (b = ‐.03, p = .002). The analyses also revealed that, controlling for the mediator (CAIDE), WMH was still a significant predictor of executive function (b = ‐.18, p <0.001), and processing speed (b = ‐.15, p <0.001), but the effects were smaller. Conclusion These results suggest that MA with higher WMH perform worse in measures of executive function and processing speed, and that association is partially mediated by higher CAIDE scores. Further studies are needed to investigate if cognitive performance in normal individuals with WMH and high CAIDE scores.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
University of North Texas (US), University of North Texas Health Science Center (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Nutritional Studies and Diet
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.