Pragmatic considerations in clinical biomarker testing for Alzheimer disease

Abstract Background With the traditional FDA approval of lecanemab for treatment of early symptomatic Alzheimer disease (AD), there has been a surge in demand for clinical AD biomarker testing. While amyloid PET, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers, and AD blood tests are all clinically available, each have different benefits and limitations affecting their real‐world use. Methods Pragmatic issues affecting usage of different AD biomarker testing modalities have been experienced in a large specialty memory clinic in St. Louis, MO, USA, that has been scaling up clinical AD biomarker testing, particularly in patients who are candidates for lecanemab treatment. Results The high and/or uncertain cost of amyloid PET has limited its use to a small number of patients. CSF biomarkers are the major modality used for AD biomarker testing. The number of lumbar punctures (LPs) has increased from ∼5/month in 2018‐2022 to ∼25/month after the approval of lecanemab. Most patients are willing to undergo LP, the procedure is tolerated well, the cost to patients is reasonable, and insurers are accepting a positive CSF test as sufficient evidence of amyloid pathology for initiation of lecanemab. However, reimbursement for LP is inadequate and LP clinics are burdensome to staff and patients. Approximately 200 AD blood tests have been performed in clinic patients over the past three years. Factors limiting use of AD blood tests include the cost to patients and private insurers not accepting AD blood tests for initiation of lecanemab (Medicare is accepting AD blood tests). More broadly, clinical use of AD blood tests has been complicated by the availability of tests with varying levels of accuracy and interpretability. Conclusions Because the major indication for clinical AD biomarker testing is now confirmation of amyloid pathology in patients who are candidates for lecanemab, insurance decisions about which biomarkers are acceptable are driving which AD biomarker modalities are performed. When high accuracy AD blood tests are reimbursed by insurance and accepted as evidence of amyloid pathology, it is likely they will become the dominant modality of AD biomarker testing due to lower burden on staff and patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.088362
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pragmatic considerations in clinical biomarker testing for Alzheimer disease

Madeline Paczynski, Suzanne E. Schindler, B. Joy Snider, Dawn Ellington
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Pragmatic considerations in clinical biomarker testing for Alzheimer disease

Madeline Paczynski, Suzanne E. Schindler, B. Joy Snider, Dawn Ellington
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background With the traditional FDA approval of lecanemab for treatment of early symptomatic Alzheimer disease (AD), there has been a surge in demand for clinical AD biomarker testing. While amyloid PET, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers, and AD blood tests are all clinically available, each have different benefits and limitations affecting their real‐world use. Methods Pragmatic issues affecting usage of different AD biomarker testing modalities have been experienced in a large specialty memory clinic in St. Louis, MO, USA, that has been scaling up clinical AD biomarker testing, particularly in patients who are candidates for lecanemab treatment. Results The high and/or uncertain cost of amyloid PET has limited its use to a small number of patients. CSF biomarkers are the major modality used for AD biomarker testing. The number of lumbar punctures (LPs) has increased from ∼5/month in 2018‐2022 to ∼25/month after the approval of lecanemab. Most patients are willing to undergo LP, the procedure is tolerated well, the cost to patients is reasonable, and insurers are accepting a positive CSF test as sufficient evidence of amyloid pathology for initiation of lecanemab. However, reimbursement for LP is inadequate and LP clinics are burdensome to staff and patients. Approximately 200 AD blood tests have been performed in clinic patients over the past three years. Factors limiting use of AD blood tests include the cost to patients and private insurers not accepting AD blood tests for initiation of lecanemab (Medicare is accepting AD blood tests). More broadly, clinical use of AD blood tests has been complicated by the availability of tests with varying levels of accuracy and interpretability. Conclusions Because the major indication for clinical AD biomarker testing is now confirmation of amyloid pathology in patients who are candidates for lecanemab, insurance decisions about which biomarkers are acceptable are driving which AD biomarker modalities are performed. When high accuracy AD blood tests are reimbursed by insurance and accepted as evidence of amyloid pathology, it is likely they will become the dominant modality of AD biomarker testing due to lower burden on staff and patients.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Prevent Alzheimer’s Disease 2020 (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.