Intersections of sex and racialization on ATV(N) biomarkers

Abstract Background Differences in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) amyloid, tau, vascular, and neurodegeneration (ATV(N)) biomarkers by sex and racialized group have been reported, but little is known about the intersections of sex and racialization on these biomarkers. Methods Participants in this cross‐sectional analysis are from the Connectomics of Brain Aging study, a Human Connectome Project protocol evaluating brain structure and function in aging and AD. We measured A using global amyloid SUVR from 11 C‐PiB PET, T using plasma p‐tau 217, V using lobar unhealthy white matter connectivity (UWMC), a novel measure indicating the proportion of WM connections impacted by white matter hyperintensities (WMH), and N using cortical thickness from an AD‐based meta‐region of interest. We tested for intersectional effects of sex and racialized group on ATV(N) biomarkers in robust regressions by testing models with and without sex*racialized group interaction terms. Results The sample included N=202 participants with the following characteristics: age, 62 years; female sex, 67%; Black racialization, 50%; education, 14 years; APOE4+, 31%; cognitively impaired, 27%; Table 1. In robust regression models we found that women had significantly more amyloid and frontal UWMC, and less tau and parietal and occipital UWMC than men; participants racialized as Black had significantly more temporal lobe UWMC and significantly less occipital lobe UWMC, amyloid, tau, and cortical thickness than participants racialized as white (Table 2). Intersectional effects were found only for parietal lobe UWMC (p for interaction=0.03; Table 2), such that men racialized as Black had the greatest parietal UWMC, while men and women racialized as white did not vary in their parietal UWMC (Figure 1). Results with lobar WMH instead of UWMC were similar. Conclusion Our results confirm ATV(N) biomarker differences by sex and racialized group. They suggest that men racialized as Black may be uniquely at risk for UWMC in the parietal lobe but found no intersectional effects on other biomarkers. Future work will investigate specific WM tracts involved in the parietal UWMC and associated risk factors such as structural and social determinants of health as well as cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.087089
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Science, Research, and Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intersections of sex and racialization on ATV(N) biomarkers

C. Elizabeth Shaaban, Rebecca E. Roush, Sarah K. Royse, Beth E. Snitz et al.
1 citations
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Science, Research, and Medicine
0.54
article

Intersections of sex and racialization on ATV(N) biomarkers

C. Elizabeth Shaaban, Rebecca E. Roush, Sarah K. Royse, Beth E. Snitz, Thomas K. Karikari, Geraldine Cisneros, Theodore J. Huppert, James Hengenius, James T. Becker, Katey Potopenko, Annie D. Cohen, Alexandria C. Reese
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Differences in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) amyloid, tau, vascular, and neurodegeneration (ATV(N)) biomarkers by sex and racialized group have been reported, but little is known about the intersections of sex and racialization on these biomarkers. Methods Participants in this cross‐sectional analysis are from the Connectomics of Brain Aging study, a Human Connectome Project protocol evaluating brain structure and function in aging and AD. We measured A using global amyloid SUVR from 11 C‐PiB PET, T using plasma p‐tau 217, V using lobar unhealthy white matter connectivity (UWMC), a novel measure indicating the proportion of WM connections impacted by white matter hyperintensities (WMH), and N using cortical thickness from an AD‐based meta‐region of interest. We tested for intersectional effects of sex and racialized group on ATV(N) biomarkers in robust regressions by testing models with and without sex*racialized group interaction terms. Results The sample included N=202 participants with the following characteristics: age, 62 years; female sex, 67%; Black racialization, 50%; education, 14 years; APOE4+, 31%; cognitively impaired, 27%; Table 1. In robust regression models we found that women had significantly more amyloid and frontal UWMC, and less tau and parietal and occipital UWMC than men; participants racialized as Black had significantly more temporal lobe UWMC and significantly less occipital lobe UWMC, amyloid, tau, and cortical thickness than participants racialized as white (Table 2). Intersectional effects were found only for parietal lobe UWMC (p for interaction=0.03; Table 2), such that men racialized as Black had the greatest parietal UWMC, while men and women racialized as white did not vary in their parietal UWMC (Figure 1). Results with lobar WMH instead of UWMC were similar. Conclusion Our results confirm ATV(N) biomarker differences by sex and racialized group. They suggest that men racialized as Black may be uniquely at risk for UWMC in the parietal lobe but found no intersectional effects on other biomarkers. Future work will investigate specific WM tracts involved in the parietal UWMC and associated risk factors such as structural and social determinants of health as well as cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
University of Pittsburgh (US), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine (CA), Université de Montréal (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Science, Research, and Medicine
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.