Automated Thigh Tissue Segmentation by Vision Transformers: Application for Early Alzheimer's Diagnosis

Abstract Background Within the research field of neurodegenerative disorders, unbiased analysis of body fat composition, particularly muscle mass, is gaining attention as a potential biological marker for refining Alzheimer’s disease risk. The objective of this study was to employ a deep learning model for fully automated and accurate segmentation of thigh tissues, potentially contributing to early Alzheimer's diagnostics. Method In an IRB‐approved study, 49 participants underwent thigh Dixon MRI scans with a TR=9.99s, TE=2.46s, flip angle=10°, and slice thickness= 5mm. The Dixon Fat/Water images were semi‐automatically segmented by an expert operator in all available slices to obtain the bone, intermuscular fat (InterFat), intramuscular fat (IntraFat), Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT), Muscle, and Gluteus. We trained and compared the performance of baseline and state‐of‐the‐art deep neural networks, namely, UNet, VNet, and two vision transformers (ViTs): UNETR and SwinUNETR. The performance of the trained models was tested on all data sets using a 3‐fold cross‐validation scheme. Result We found SwinUNETR outperformed the others with a mean dice similarity coefficient 96.20 (± 0.51), 80.91 (± 0.55), 50.56 (± 1.43), 95.26 (± 0.80), 98.70), 86.72 (± 1.12) in Bone, InterFat, IntraFat, SAT, Muscle, and Gluteus, respectively. Bland–Altman analysis and scatter plot (Figure 1) indicated that the differences between manual annotations and predictions by the SwinUNETR model were relatively minor for Bone volume, Intramuscular Fat volume, Muscle volume, and Gluteus volume classes. The overall mean difference is ‐88.8cm 3 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of [‐159.53, ‐18.13]. Biases [95% CI] for each tissue class were 5.44cm 3 [−8.61, 19.50] for Bone volume, 51.74cm 3 [−22.72, 126.20] for InterFat volume, 11.15cm 3 [2.76, 19.53] for IntraFat volume, ‐191.09cm 3 [−309.54, ‐72.64] for SAT volume, 15.16cm 3 [−6.37, 36.70] for Muscle volume, and 18.76cm 3 [2.20, 35.32] for Gluteus volume. Conclusion This study highlighted the use of ViTs for the automated segmentation of thigh tissues in MR which may allow for the detection of subtle changes in muscle mass and fat composition, that are of increasing interests in their associations with the neurodegenerative processes in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.092665
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automated Thigh Tissue Segmentation by Vision Transformers: Application for Early Alzheimer's Diagnosis

Tammie L.S. Benzinger, Joseph E. Ippolito, Bettina Mittendorfer, Gary Yu et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Medical Imaging and Analysis
article

Automated Thigh Tissue Segmentation by Vision Transformers: Application for Early Alzheimer's Diagnosis

Tammie L.S. Benzinger, Joseph E. Ippolito, Bettina Mittendorfer, Gary Yu, Jingxia Liu, Claude B. Sirlin, Mahsa Dolatshahi, Farzaneh Rahmani, Cyrus A. Raji, Nancy Hantler, LaKisha Lloyd, Paul K. Commean, Maria Ly, Abby McBee‐Kemper, Mahshid Naghashzadeh, Caitlyn Nguyen, Sara Hosseinzadeh Kasani, John C. Morris
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Within the research field of neurodegenerative disorders, unbiased analysis of body fat composition, particularly muscle mass, is gaining attention as a potential biological marker for refining Alzheimer’s disease risk. The objective of this study was to employ a deep learning model for fully automated and accurate segmentation of thigh tissues, potentially contributing to early Alzheimer's diagnostics. Method In an IRB‐approved study, 49 participants underwent thigh Dixon MRI scans with a TR=9.99s, TE=2.46s, flip angle=10°, and slice thickness= 5mm. The Dixon Fat/Water images were semi‐automatically segmented by an expert operator in all available slices to obtain the bone, intermuscular fat (InterFat), intramuscular fat (IntraFat), Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT), Muscle, and Gluteus. We trained and compared the performance of baseline and state‐of‐the‐art deep neural networks, namely, UNet, VNet, and two vision transformers (ViTs): UNETR and SwinUNETR. The performance of the trained models was tested on all data sets using a 3‐fold cross‐validation scheme. Result We found SwinUNETR outperformed the others with a mean dice similarity coefficient 96.20 (± 0.51), 80.91 (± 0.55), 50.56 (± 1.43), 95.26 (± 0.80), 98.70), 86.72 (± 1.12) in Bone, InterFat, IntraFat, SAT, Muscle, and Gluteus, respectively. Bland–Altman analysis and scatter plot (Figure 1) indicated that the differences between manual annotations and predictions by the SwinUNETR model were relatively minor for Bone volume, Intramuscular Fat volume, Muscle volume, and Gluteus volume classes. The overall mean difference is ‐88.8cm 3 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of [‐159.53, ‐18.13]. Biases [95% CI] for each tissue class were 5.44cm 3 [−8.61, 19.50] for Bone volume, 51.74cm 3 [−22.72, 126.20] for InterFat volume, 11.15cm 3 [2.76, 19.53] for IntraFat volume, ‐191.09cm 3 [−309.54, ‐72.64] for SAT volume, 15.16cm 3 [−6.37, 36.70] for Muscle volume, and 18.76cm 3 [2.20, 35.32] for Gluteus volume. Conclusion This study highlighted the use of ViTs for the automated segmentation of thigh tissues in MR which may allow for the detection of subtle changes in muscle mass and fat composition, that are of increasing interests in their associations with the neurodegenerative processes in Alzheimer's disease.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Washington University in St. Louis (US), University of California San Diego (US), Mallinckrodt (United States) (US), Prevent Alzheimer’s Disease 2020 (US), University of Missouri (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Medical Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.