Sex Differences in Amyloid PET in a Large, Real‐Life Sample from the Imaging Dementia‐Evidence for Amyloid Scanning (IDEAS) Study

Abstract Background Previous studies on sex differences in amyloid burden have shown inconsistent findings. We examined the effect of sex on amyloid‐PET outcomes in a large, real‐world, cohort of individuals with cognitive impairment. Method The IDEAS study evaluated the clinical utility of amyloid‐PET in 18,295 Medicare beneficiaries age ≥65 years with MCI or dementia. All scans were visually interpreted as positive or negative at each site by a local radiologist or nuclear medicine physician. A subset of 10,361 scans were centrally processed and quantified in Centiloids. We used multivariate logistic regression to calculate odds ratios of amyloid‐PET positivity (based on visual read) for males and females, adjusting for demographic and clinical risk factors. We used linear regression to assess the association between sex and amyloid burden quantified in Centiloids. Result Of 10,361 included individuals, 51% were females. Compared to males, females were slightly younger (75 versus 76 median age, p=0.008) and had higher rates of dementia (39.3% versus 35.2%, p<0.001). Rates of vascular risk factors were significantly higher in males than females, whereas females had significantly higher rates of history of depression and family history of AD. Females had higher rates of amyloid‐PET positivity than males (63% versus 59%, p<.001) and higher Centiloid values (median=48.7 versus 36.9, p<.01); see Figure 1 and Table 1 model 1. Sex differences remained significant in models adjusted for demographics and clinical risk factors (Table 1, models 2‐3). In an analysis that included only individuals with visually positive amyloid‐PET, females exhibited higher Centiloid values than males (Table 1 multivariable linear models). In amyloid‐positive individuals, we found a significant interaction between sex and age, with greatest sex differences in amyloid burden found in the youngest females (Figure 2A). We also found a significant interaction between sex and race, with greatest differences found in Black females vs. males (Figure 2B). Conclusion Females with cognitive impairment exhibited a higher frequency of amyloid‐PET positivity and higher amyloid burden. Our findings shed light on sex‐specific biological and potential sociocultural differences in Alzheimer's disease pathology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.090224
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sex Differences in Amyloid PET in a Large, Real‐Life Sample from the Imaging Dementia‐Evidence for Amyloid Scanning (IDEAS) Study

Renaud La Joie, Daniel R. Schonhaut, Constantine Gatsonis, Ehud Zeltzer et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
article

Sex Differences in Amyloid PET in a Large, Real‐Life Sample from the Imaging Dementia‐Evidence for Amyloid Scanning (IDEAS) Study

Renaud La Joie, Daniel R. Schonhaut, Constantine Gatsonis, Ehud Zeltzer, María C. Carrillo, Barry A. Siegel, Nidhi S. Mundada, Gil Dan Rabinovici, Isabel Elaine Allen, Andrew March, Maison Abu Raya, Charles Windon, Bruce E. Hillner, Rachel A. Whitmer, Lucy Hanna, Jhony Alejandro Mejía‐Perez, Leo Iaccarino
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Previous studies on sex differences in amyloid burden have shown inconsistent findings. We examined the effect of sex on amyloid‐PET outcomes in a large, real‐world, cohort of individuals with cognitive impairment. Method The IDEAS study evaluated the clinical utility of amyloid‐PET in 18,295 Medicare beneficiaries age ≥65 years with MCI or dementia. All scans were visually interpreted as positive or negative at each site by a local radiologist or nuclear medicine physician. A subset of 10,361 scans were centrally processed and quantified in Centiloids. We used multivariate logistic regression to calculate odds ratios of amyloid‐PET positivity (based on visual read) for males and females, adjusting for demographic and clinical risk factors. We used linear regression to assess the association between sex and amyloid burden quantified in Centiloids. Result Of 10,361 included individuals, 51% were females. Compared to males, females were slightly younger (75 versus 76 median age, p=0.008) and had higher rates of dementia (39.3% versus 35.2%, p<0.001). Rates of vascular risk factors were significantly higher in males than females, whereas females had significantly higher rates of history of depression and family history of AD. Females had higher rates of amyloid‐PET positivity than males (63% versus 59%, p<.001) and higher Centiloid values (median=48.7 versus 36.9, p<.01); see Figure 1 and Table 1 model 1. Sex differences remained significant in models adjusted for demographics and clinical risk factors (Table 1, models 2‐3). In an analysis that included only individuals with visually positive amyloid‐PET, females exhibited higher Centiloid values than males (Table 1 multivariable linear models). In amyloid‐positive individuals, we found a significant interaction between sex and age, with greatest sex differences in amyloid burden found in the youngest females (Figure 2A). We also found a significant interaction between sex and race, with greatest differences found in Black females vs. males (Figure 2B). Conclusion Females with cognitive impairment exhibited a higher frequency of amyloid‐PET positivity and higher amyloid burden. Our findings shed light on sex‐specific biological and potential sociocultural differences in Alzheimer's disease pathology.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
American College of Radiology (US), Alzheimer's Association (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Virginia Commonwealth University (US), Adolfo Ibáñez University (CL), Brown University (US), Mallinckrodt (United States) (US), University Memory and Aging Center (US), Global Brain Health Institute (US), University of California, Davis (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.