One‐week test‐retest reliability of an unsupervised, online version of the Digit Symbol Modalities task among older adults

Abstract Background Measuring individual cognitive ability is critical for the diagnosis of neurodegenerative disease and prognosis of neurorehabilitation. Ideally, individual cognitive ability is achieved through an in‐person neuropsychological assessment by a trained and licensed clinician. However, there are several barriers that may prevent a prospective patient from being assessed (e.g., lack of transportation, reduced access to qualified professionals, etc.). Thus, we developed an online, unsupervised version of the digit symbol modalities task (DSMT), a subtest of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) that measures individual processing speed. The online DSMT can be performed both via a computer or touchscreen device. The purpose of this experiment was to examine the one‐week test‐retest reliability of the online DSMT among a group of adults 55 years and older. Method Sixty‐eight adults (mean age = 59.6 ± 4.8; female = 14, computer/touchscreen = 68/0) completed the initial and one‐week assessment of the online DSMT. Participants were presented with an instructional video on how to complete the assessment and a limited practice set of the DSMT to become familiarized. Presentation of symbol order was the same across each assessment day and between participants. A one‐way model of intraclass correlation for consistency was used to calculate the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Result Results indicated an ICC = .68 (p<.001, 95% CI = [.52; .79]). Furthermore, a dependent t‐test between the initial test (mean = 29.2+/‐10.6) and the one‐week test (mean = 30.8+/‐11.5) was not statistically significant (p = .16), which indicates that performance was relatively stable between time‐points. This result is consistent with prior examinations of ‘good’ test‐retest reliability of the DSMT administered in‐person. Conclusion Overall, these results indicate that online, unsupervised DSMT performance is consistent across a one‐week period among adults 55 years and older. Furthermore, the transformation of what is commonly a paper‐and‐pencil test into an online assessment allows for the engineering of digital based performance features that may serve as potential digital biomarkers of neurodegeneration. Future research will validate online DSMT performance with other indicators of neurodegenerative disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.092895
Primary Topic
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

One‐week test‐retest reliability of an unsupervised, online version of the Digit Symbol Modalities task among older adults

Sydney Y. Schaefer, Kevin M. Duff, Andrew Hooyman
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
article

One‐week test‐retest reliability of an unsupervised, online version of the Digit Symbol Modalities task among older adults

Sydney Y. Schaefer, Kevin M. Duff, Andrew Hooyman
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Measuring individual cognitive ability is critical for the diagnosis of neurodegenerative disease and prognosis of neurorehabilitation. Ideally, individual cognitive ability is achieved through an in‐person neuropsychological assessment by a trained and licensed clinician. However, there are several barriers that may prevent a prospective patient from being assessed (e.g., lack of transportation, reduced access to qualified professionals, etc.). Thus, we developed an online, unsupervised version of the digit symbol modalities task (DSMT), a subtest of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) that measures individual processing speed. The online DSMT can be performed both via a computer or touchscreen device. The purpose of this experiment was to examine the one‐week test‐retest reliability of the online DSMT among a group of adults 55 years and older. Method Sixty‐eight adults (mean age = 59.6 ± 4.8; female = 14, computer/touchscreen = 68/0) completed the initial and one‐week assessment of the online DSMT. Participants were presented with an instructional video on how to complete the assessment and a limited practice set of the DSMT to become familiarized. Presentation of symbol order was the same across each assessment day and between participants. A one‐way model of intraclass correlation for consistency was used to calculate the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Result Results indicated an ICC = .68 (p<.001, 95% CI = [.52; .79]). Furthermore, a dependent t‐test between the initial test (mean = 29.2+/‐10.6) and the one‐week test (mean = 30.8+/‐11.5) was not statistically significant (p = .16), which indicates that performance was relatively stable between time‐points. This result is consistent with prior examinations of ‘good’ test‐retest reliability of the DSMT administered in‐person. Conclusion Overall, these results indicate that online, unsupervised DSMT performance is consistent across a one‐week period among adults 55 years and older. Furthermore, the transformation of what is commonly a paper‐and‐pencil test into an online assessment allows for the engineering of digital based performance features that may serve as potential digital biomarkers of neurodegeneration. Future research will validate online DSMT performance with other indicators of neurodegenerative disease.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Oregon Health & Science University (US), Layton BioScience (United States) (US), Arizona State University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.