Accounting for White Matter Uptake Improves Between‐Tracer Agreement in Amyloid PET

Abstract Background Different PET tracers can be used to measure neuritic amyloid plaque deposition in human brain. While mean cortical‐to‐cerebellar standard uptake value ratios (SUVRs) generated using different radiotracer methods can be transformed into Centiloid measurements to facilitate comparisons among the resulting amyloid plaque measurements, the level of agreement as measured by the strength of the correlation between the measurements does not change. In this study, paired 18F‐labeled (i.e., florbetapir, florbetaben, flutemetamol, and NAV4694) and 11C PiB radiotracers from the same research participants to test the hypothesis that the correlation between amyloid plaque measurements derived using different radiotracers can be improved by accounting for variability in white matter uptake. Method For all four 18F‐labeled radiotracers, paired 18F‐radiotracer and PiB‐derived PET images were downloaded from the Centiloid project ( www.gaain.org/centiloid‐project ). An in‐house image‐analysis pipeline was used to generate mean cortical‐to‐cerebellar SUVRs (MC‐SUVRs) from every PET image. Two approaches to account for white matter contributions to MC‐SUVR in the inherently low‐resolution PET images: 1) a linear regression approach to account for white matter contributions using a FreeSurfer‐defined UnsegmentedWhiteMatter SUVR; and 2) a regional spread function (RSF)‐based partial volume correction (PVC) technique. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to assess the agreement between F18 tracer‐based measure and PIB. Steiger’s test was used to determine whether accounting for white matter signal significantly improves agreement. Result Accounting for white matter signal improved the agreement between each 18F radiotracer‐based MC‐SUVR and the corresponding PiB‐derived MC‐SUVR. Using the regression approach, the correlations with PiB SUVRs were significantly improved for florbetapir (p<0.0001) and flutemetamol (p=0.03) but did not reach significance for florbetaben and NAV4694. For the PVC‐based approach, correlations with PiB SUVRs were significantly greater for all four 18F‐tracers (p<0.05). Conclusion The relationship between mean cortical measurement of amyloid plaque burden using different PET tracers can be significantly improved by accounting for differences in white matter uptake. Additional studies are needed to optimize this approach and account for any other potential confounds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.090045
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accounting for White Matter Uptake Improves Between‐Tracer Agreement in Amyloid PET

Hillary Protas, Eric M. Reiman, Javad Sohankar, Ji Luo et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
article

Accounting for White Matter Uptake Improves Between‐Tracer Agreement in Amyloid PET

Hillary Protas, Eric M. Reiman, Javad Sohankar, Ji Luo, Valentina Ghisays, Teresa Wu, Kewei Chen, Shan Li, Yinghua Chen, Yi Su, Wendy Lee
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Different PET tracers can be used to measure neuritic amyloid plaque deposition in human brain. While mean cortical‐to‐cerebellar standard uptake value ratios (SUVRs) generated using different radiotracer methods can be transformed into Centiloid measurements to facilitate comparisons among the resulting amyloid plaque measurements, the level of agreement as measured by the strength of the correlation between the measurements does not change. In this study, paired 18F‐labeled (i.e., florbetapir, florbetaben, flutemetamol, and NAV4694) and 11C PiB radiotracers from the same research participants to test the hypothesis that the correlation between amyloid plaque measurements derived using different radiotracers can be improved by accounting for variability in white matter uptake. Method For all four 18F‐labeled radiotracers, paired 18F‐radiotracer and PiB‐derived PET images were downloaded from the Centiloid project ( www.gaain.org/centiloid‐project ). An in‐house image‐analysis pipeline was used to generate mean cortical‐to‐cerebellar SUVRs (MC‐SUVRs) from every PET image. Two approaches to account for white matter contributions to MC‐SUVR in the inherently low‐resolution PET images: 1) a linear regression approach to account for white matter contributions using a FreeSurfer‐defined UnsegmentedWhiteMatter SUVR; and 2) a regional spread function (RSF)‐based partial volume correction (PVC) technique. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to assess the agreement between F18 tracer‐based measure and PIB. Steiger’s test was used to determine whether accounting for white matter signal significantly improves agreement. Result Accounting for white matter signal improved the agreement between each 18F radiotracer‐based MC‐SUVR and the corresponding PiB‐derived MC‐SUVR. Using the regression approach, the correlations with PiB SUVRs were significantly improved for florbetapir (p<0.0001) and flutemetamol (p=0.03) but did not reach significance for florbetaben and NAV4694. For the PVC‐based approach, correlations with PiB SUVRs were significantly greater for all four 18F‐tracers (p<0.05). Conclusion The relationship between mean cortical measurement of amyloid plaque burden using different PET tracers can be significantly improved by accounting for differences in white matter uptake. Additional studies are needed to optimize this approach and account for any other potential confounds.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Alzheimer's Association (US), University of Arizona (US), University of Phoenix (US), Advanced Imaging Research (United States) (US), Banner Alzheimer’s Institute, Arizona Alzheimer’s Consortium, Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.