Predicting postmortem neuropathology of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias using widely accessible clinical data

Abstract Background Faced with a rapidly aging population and the rising prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and related dementias, the field needs to urgently consider screening tools that utilize widely accessible data modalities. We have previously shown that lower‐cost data, operationalized as data modalities accessible at primary care visits, can indeed accurately predict AD clinical diagnosis and that clustering these data can provide useful information. Here, we apply a similar approach to predicting histopathological status. Method We first applied our previously‐developed feature extraction method based on a supervised encoder (SE) to transform potentially noisy input features while maintaining or amplifying relevant information. We next performed classification and clustering to stratify subjects by their neuropathology. Here, we compared two traditional classification methods with a novel Bayesian clustering‐classification algorithm called an Infinite Mixture Classifier (IMC). We identified distinct trajectories of subjects based upon changes in cluster assignment over time. Data for this study come from the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center, funded by NIA/NIH Grant U24 AG072122 and contributed to by NIA‐funded ADRCs. Result We found that relatively high classification accuracy of neuropathologic lesions was possible using widely accessible, lower cost clinical data. In addition, the supervised clusters, derived from using the SE’s latent features and from the IMC, held meaningful clinical diagnostic information that differentiates subjects along the clinical and pathologic continuum. When clusters were derived using longitudinal clinical data, we further observed distinct trajectories of subjects across time as their cluster assignments changed. These trajectory subgroups have significantly different risk of showcasing each type of neuropathologic lesion obtained from postmortem neuropathology. Conclusion Our framework benefits from the combined strengths of clustering and classification methods while avoiding drawbacks of unsupervised methods. By using lower cost features, which could be obtained at Medicare annual wellness visits, this work is broadly generalizable and has direct implications for screening of neuropathologic lesions of AD and related dementias for the public. As blood biomarkers become more accessible, our framework can be easily extended to include additional data to improve screening for neuropathology using widely accessible data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.092688
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting postmortem neuropathology of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias using widely accessible clinical data

Babak Shahbaba, Craig E.L. Stark, Yueqi Ren
2 links
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Machine Learning in Healthcare
article

Predicting postmortem neuropathology of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias using widely accessible clinical data

Babak Shahbaba, Craig E.L. Stark, Yueqi Ren
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Faced with a rapidly aging population and the rising prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and related dementias, the field needs to urgently consider screening tools that utilize widely accessible data modalities. We have previously shown that lower‐cost data, operationalized as data modalities accessible at primary care visits, can indeed accurately predict AD clinical diagnosis and that clustering these data can provide useful information. Here, we apply a similar approach to predicting histopathological status. Method We first applied our previously‐developed feature extraction method based on a supervised encoder (SE) to transform potentially noisy input features while maintaining or amplifying relevant information. We next performed classification and clustering to stratify subjects by their neuropathology. Here, we compared two traditional classification methods with a novel Bayesian clustering‐classification algorithm called an Infinite Mixture Classifier (IMC). We identified distinct trajectories of subjects based upon changes in cluster assignment over time. Data for this study come from the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center, funded by NIA/NIH Grant U24 AG072122 and contributed to by NIA‐funded ADRCs. Result We found that relatively high classification accuracy of neuropathologic lesions was possible using widely accessible, lower cost clinical data. In addition, the supervised clusters, derived from using the SE’s latent features and from the IMC, held meaningful clinical diagnostic information that differentiates subjects along the clinical and pathologic continuum. When clusters were derived using longitudinal clinical data, we further observed distinct trajectories of subjects across time as their cluster assignments changed. These trajectory subgroups have significantly different risk of showcasing each type of neuropathologic lesion obtained from postmortem neuropathology. Conclusion Our framework benefits from the combined strengths of clustering and classification methods while avoiding drawbacks of unsupervised methods. By using lower cost features, which could be obtained at Medicare annual wellness visits, this work is broadly generalizable and has direct implications for screening of neuropathologic lesions of AD and related dementias for the public. As blood biomarkers become more accessible, our framework can be easily extended to include additional data to improve screening for neuropathology using widely accessible data.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
University of California, Irvine (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Machine Learning in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.