Essential oil blend and monensin for feedlot steers consuming backgrounding and finishing diets: growth performance, methane emissions using the GreenFeed system, and feeding behavior

A study was conducted to assess growth performance, methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions, and feeding behavior of feedlot steers consuming backgrounding and finishing diets with an essential oil blend (EO), monensin (Mon), and their combination (EO + Mon). The study was structured as a 2 × 2 factorial, with two feed additive treatments (Control, EO) and two monensin treatments (no Monensin, Monensin). One hundred Angus × steers were evenly distributed across each treatment into four pens, and each dietary phase consisted of four, 28-d periods. Using the GreenFeed system to estimate CH<sub>4</sub> yield (g CH<sub>4</sub>/kg dry matter intake [DMI]), the mean CV (coefficient of variation) within the same steer across measurement periods was 14.0% and 15.2% for the backgrounding and finishing phases, respectively. The mean CV of CH<sub>4</sub> production for steer within period and time-of-day block was up to 83.4% and 102.9% for the backgrounding and finishing phases, respectively. There was no difference in overall average daily gain (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.22) or gain:feed ratio (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.26) with EO or Monensin during the backgrounding or finishing phases. There were variable period effects on CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, but overall control had lower (EO × Mon; <i>P</i> ≤ 0.01) CH<sub>4</sub> production, yield, and CH<sub>4</sub> energy as a percentage of gross energy intake (GEI) (Ym, Mcal CH<sub>4</sub> % GEI), during the backgrounding phase. During the finishing phase, CH<sub>4</sub> yield (EO × Mon; <i>P</i> = 0.02) and Ym (EO × Mon; <i>P</i> ≤ 0.01) were greatest in the EO + Mon treatment. Monensin, irrespective of EO, decreased DMI (<i>P</i> < 0.01) and eating rate (<i>P</i> = 0.01), and increased intermeal interval (<i>P</i> < 0.01) for the backgrounding phase. In the finishing phase, Monensin decreased (<i>P</i> < 0.01) DMI, variation of DMI (EO × Mon), meal size, and eating rate. Number of GreenFeed visits was negatively (<i>P</i> < 0.01) correlated with all feeding behavior metrics in the finishing phase. In conclusion, supplementation of EO or Monensin and their combination into backgrounding and finishing diets of feedlot steers had no effect on overall feedlot performance or CH<sub>4</sub> emissions. Additionally, the high variability in CV of CH<sub>4</sub> production and yield suggests a need to improve the accuracy and precision of the GreenFeed system for estimating enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions from cattle.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Translational Animal Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txae182
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Essential oil blend and monensin for feedlot steers consuming backgrounding and finishing diets: growth performance, methane emissions using the GreenFeed system, and feeding behavior

K. A. Beauchemin, Stephanie A. Terry
2 citations
Translational Animal Science
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
2.39
article

Essential oil blend and monensin for feedlot steers consuming backgrounding and finishing diets: growth performance, methane emissions using the GreenFeed system, and feeding behavior

K. A. Beauchemin, Stephanie A. Terry
article en
2 citations

Abstract

A study was conducted to assess growth performance, methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions, and feeding behavior of feedlot steers consuming backgrounding and finishing diets with an essential oil blend (EO), monensin (Mon), and their combination (EO + Mon). The study was structured as a 2 × 2 factorial, with two feed additive treatments (Control, EO) and two monensin treatments (no Monensin, Monensin). One hundred Angus × steers were evenly distributed across each treatment into four pens, and each dietary phase consisted of four, 28-d periods. Using the GreenFeed system to estimate CH<sub>4</sub> yield (g CH<sub>4</sub>/kg dry matter intake [DMI]), the mean CV (coefficient of variation) within the same steer across measurement periods was 14.0% and 15.2% for the backgrounding and finishing phases, respectively. The mean CV of CH<sub>4</sub> production for steer within period and time-of-day block was up to 83.4% and 102.9% for the backgrounding and finishing phases, respectively. There was no difference in overall average daily gain (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.22) or gain:feed ratio (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.26) with EO or Monensin during the backgrounding or finishing phases. There were variable period effects on CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, but overall control had lower (EO × Mon; <i>P</i> ≤ 0.01) CH<sub>4</sub> production, yield, and CH<sub>4</sub> energy as a percentage of gross energy intake (GEI) (Ym, Mcal CH<sub>4</sub> % GEI), during the backgrounding phase. During the finishing phase, CH<sub>4</sub> yield (EO × Mon; <i>P</i> = 0.02) and Ym (EO × Mon; <i>P</i> ≤ 0.01) were greatest in the EO + Mon treatment. Monensin, irrespective of EO, decreased DMI (<i>P</i> < 0.01) and eating rate (<i>P</i> = 0.01), and increased intermeal interval (<i>P</i> < 0.01) for the backgrounding phase. In the finishing phase, Monensin decreased (<i>P</i> < 0.01) DMI, variation of DMI (EO × Mon), meal size, and eating rate. Number of GreenFeed visits was negatively (<i>P</i> < 0.01) correlated with all feeding behavior metrics in the finishing phase. In conclusion, supplementation of EO or Monensin and their combination into backgrounding and finishing diets of feedlot steers had no effect on overall feedlot performance or CH<sub>4</sub> emissions. Additionally, the high variability in CV of CH<sub>4</sub> production and yield suggests a need to improve the accuracy and precision of the GreenFeed system for estimating enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions from cattle.

Translational Animal ScienceVol. 9
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA)
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
2.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.