Plasma biomarkers combinations for prescreening rapid amyloid accumulation in cognitively unimpaired individuals at‐risk of Alzheimer’s disease

Abstract Background Alzheimer’s disease (AD) blood biomarkers alone can detect amyloid‐β (Aβ) pathology in cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals. We assessed whether combining different plasma biomarkers improves the detection of Aβ‐positivity and identifies rapid amyloid deposition in CU individuals. Method CU participants from the ALFA+ cohort were included. Among them, 361 had CSF Aβ42/40 and 328 amyloid PET‐scans [194 with two longitudinal scans; mean interval=3.35 (0.56) years]. Plasma Aβ42/40, p‐tau181, p‐tau231, GFAP, NfL (Simoa‐based) and p‐tau217 and t‐tau (MSD‐based) were measured at baseline (Table 1). We used simple and multiple logistic models to estimate Aβ‐positivity (defined as CSF Aβ42/40<0.071 or amyloid‐PET>12 Centiloids) or Aβ accumulation rate (“Fast accumulators” defined as >3 Centiloids/year). The model contained plasma biomarkers and demographics (age and sex) as covariates. We selected as "best model" (BM) that with lowest AIC. We defined parsimonious models as those with an AUC not significantly different (DeLong test) from BM or from each other yet outperforming single biomarkers and/or demographics models (FDR corrected). For the positive agreement closest to 90%, we calculated savings in lumbar punctures and amyloid PET‐scans. Result For CSF Aβ‐positive detection, BM included plasma Aβ42/40, p‐tau181, p‐tau217, p‐tau231, GFAP and t‐tau (AUC=0.84). All simpler biomarkers combinations included plasma Ab42/40 and p‐tau231 (Table 2A). For PET Ab‐positive detection, BM included plasma Aβ42/40, p‐tau181, p‐tau217, GFAP, NFL and age (AUC=0.88). All simpler biomarkers combinations included plasma Ab42/40 and p‐tau217 (Table 2B). Regarding fast accumulators’ detection, plasma p‐tau217 was the single biomarker with the highest performance (AUC=0.70). BM included plasma Aβ42/40, p‐tau217, p‐tau231 and GFAP (AUC= 0.76). BM and the plasma Aβ42/40, p‐tau217 and GFAP (AUC=0.75) combination were the only models that outperformed the age and sex combination and single biomarkers, except for plasma p‐tau217, Aβ42/40 (AUC=0.69) or GFAP (AUC=0.68) alone (Table 2C). The combination of biomarkers could save up to 11% of lumbar punctures or 44% of amyloid‐PET to detect Ab‐positive CU individuals and 16% amyloid‐PETs to detect fast Aβ‐accumulation compared to the best single plasma biomarker (Table 2). Conclusion In CU individuals, diverse combinations of plasma biomarkers detect Aβ‐positivity and future Aβ‐accumulation with high accuracy and can lead to substantial cost savings in AD detection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.091423
Primary Topic
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Plasma biomarkers combinations for prescreening rapid amyloid accumulation in cognitively unimpaired individuals at‐risk of Alzheimer’s disease

Marta Milà‐Alomà, José Contador, Theresa A. Day, Kaj Blennow et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
article

Plasma biomarkers combinations for prescreening rapid amyloid accumulation in cognitively unimpaired individuals at‐risk of Alzheimer’s disease

Marta Milà‐Alomà, José Contador, Theresa A. Day, Kaj Blennow, Jeffrey L. Dage, Armand González Escalante, Mahnaz Shekari, Thomas K. Karikari, Paula Ortiz‐Romero, Juan Domingo Gispert, Eugeen Vanmechelen, Marc Suárez‐Calvet, Nicholas J. Ashton, Henrik Zetterberg
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Alzheimer’s disease (AD) blood biomarkers alone can detect amyloid‐β (Aβ) pathology in cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals. We assessed whether combining different plasma biomarkers improves the detection of Aβ‐positivity and identifies rapid amyloid deposition in CU individuals. Method CU participants from the ALFA+ cohort were included. Among them, 361 had CSF Aβ42/40 and 328 amyloid PET‐scans [194 with two longitudinal scans; mean interval=3.35 (0.56) years]. Plasma Aβ42/40, p‐tau181, p‐tau231, GFAP, NfL (Simoa‐based) and p‐tau217 and t‐tau (MSD‐based) were measured at baseline (Table 1). We used simple and multiple logistic models to estimate Aβ‐positivity (defined as CSF Aβ42/40<0.071 or amyloid‐PET>12 Centiloids) or Aβ accumulation rate (“Fast accumulators” defined as >3 Centiloids/year). The model contained plasma biomarkers and demographics (age and sex) as covariates. We selected as "best model" (BM) that with lowest AIC. We defined parsimonious models as those with an AUC not significantly different (DeLong test) from BM or from each other yet outperforming single biomarkers and/or demographics models (FDR corrected). For the positive agreement closest to 90%, we calculated savings in lumbar punctures and amyloid PET‐scans. Result For CSF Aβ‐positive detection, BM included plasma Aβ42/40, p‐tau181, p‐tau217, p‐tau231, GFAP and t‐tau (AUC=0.84). All simpler biomarkers combinations included plasma Ab42/40 and p‐tau231 (Table 2A). For PET Ab‐positive detection, BM included plasma Aβ42/40, p‐tau181, p‐tau217, GFAP, NFL and age (AUC=0.88). All simpler biomarkers combinations included plasma Ab42/40 and p‐tau217 (Table 2B). Regarding fast accumulators’ detection, plasma p‐tau217 was the single biomarker with the highest performance (AUC=0.70). BM included plasma Aβ42/40, p‐tau217, p‐tau231 and GFAP (AUC= 0.76). BM and the plasma Aβ42/40, p‐tau217 and GFAP (AUC=0.75) combination were the only models that outperformed the age and sex combination and single biomarkers, except for plasma p‐tau217, Aβ42/40 (AUC=0.69) or GFAP (AUC=0.68) alone (Table 2C). The combination of biomarkers could save up to 11% of lumbar punctures or 44% of amyloid‐PET to detect Ab‐positive CU individuals and 16% amyloid‐PETs to detect fast Aβ‐accumulation compared to the best single plasma biomarker (Table 2). Conclusion In CU individuals, diverse combinations of plasma biomarkers detect Aβ‐positivity and future Aβ‐accumulation with high accuracy and can lead to substantial cost savings in AD detection.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Ablynx (Belgium) (BE), Eli Lilly (United States) (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES), King's College London (GB), Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Centre for Mental Health (GB), Biomedical Research Networking Center in Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (ES), Pasqual Maragall Foundation (ES), UK Dementia Research Institute (GB), Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (ES), Hospital Del Mar (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (ES), National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (GB), ADx NeuroSciences, University College London (GB), Indiana University (US), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.