Unravelling Frontotemporal Dementia: Exploring the GABA and Glutamate Hypothesis through Semantic Deficits

Abstract Background Semantic cognition refers to our ability to manipulate and generalize knowledge and plays a critical role in communication and daily activities. Therefore, impairments in semantic cognition can have a severe impact on quality of life (e.g., dementia). Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is the cause of 12.5‐16.5% of all degenerative dementias. It is a heterogeneous group of clinical syndromes marked by progressive neurodegeneration of the frontal and temporal lobes – key regions for semantic cognition. Recent studies highlight the importance of addressing neurotransmitter deficits in FTD, particularly in glutamate and GABA. Though pathologically distinct, FTD syndromes share common neurotransmitter deficits – ‘GABA and glutamate hypothesis of FTD’. We investigate this hypothesis by linking GABA and glutamate changes with semantic deficits in FTD patients. Methods We utilized MR spectroscopy, a non‐invasive, in‐vivo technique, to measure neurochemicals, including GABA and glutamate, in the brain. Our study involved 7 FTD patients, 2 typical Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients with a symptomatic amyloid status serving as a control patient group (expected to show general cognition deficits but not specifically semantic ones, neither semantic‐specific neurotransmitter changes like those in the FTD), and 23 age‐matched healthy controls (HC). We assessed neurotransmitter concentrations in the temporal and frontal cortex, conducted computerized semantic tasks, and administered cognitive batteries assessing language, memory, attention, and executive function. Results FTD patients showed deficits in language, memory, and executive function compared to AD patients and HCs (see Figure 1). AD patients also showed decreased general cognition compared to HC. Importantly, FTD patients performed the semantic task less effectively than ADs and HCs (see Figure 2). The balance between excitation and inhibition (EIB = glutamate/GABA) was significantly decreased in the temporal lobe in FTD patients compared to HCs (see Figure 3). Conclusions FTD demonstrated cognitive deficits in language, memory, and executive function, along with decreased semantic task performance and reduced EIB in the temporal lobe. These preliminary findings support the GABA and glutamate hypothesis of FTD. Ongoing data collection on this CogNID project (IRAS reference: 250525, clinical trial reference: NCT03861884) will provide additional results, with more patient data to be presented at the AAIC conference.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.088279
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unravelling Frontotemporal Dementia: Exploring the GABA and Glutamate Hypothesis through Semantic Deficits

Zlatomira G. Ilchovska, Akram A. Hosseini, JeYoung Jung
1 links
Alzheimer s & Dementia
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
article

Unravelling Frontotemporal Dementia: Exploring the GABA and Glutamate Hypothesis through Semantic Deficits

Zlatomira G. Ilchovska, Akram A. Hosseini, JeYoung Jung
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Semantic cognition refers to our ability to manipulate and generalize knowledge and plays a critical role in communication and daily activities. Therefore, impairments in semantic cognition can have a severe impact on quality of life (e.g., dementia). Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is the cause of 12.5‐16.5% of all degenerative dementias. It is a heterogeneous group of clinical syndromes marked by progressive neurodegeneration of the frontal and temporal lobes – key regions for semantic cognition. Recent studies highlight the importance of addressing neurotransmitter deficits in FTD, particularly in glutamate and GABA. Though pathologically distinct, FTD syndromes share common neurotransmitter deficits – ‘GABA and glutamate hypothesis of FTD’. We investigate this hypothesis by linking GABA and glutamate changes with semantic deficits in FTD patients. Methods We utilized MR spectroscopy, a non‐invasive, in‐vivo technique, to measure neurochemicals, including GABA and glutamate, in the brain. Our study involved 7 FTD patients, 2 typical Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients with a symptomatic amyloid status serving as a control patient group (expected to show general cognition deficits but not specifically semantic ones, neither semantic‐specific neurotransmitter changes like those in the FTD), and 23 age‐matched healthy controls (HC). We assessed neurotransmitter concentrations in the temporal and frontal cortex, conducted computerized semantic tasks, and administered cognitive batteries assessing language, memory, attention, and executive function. Results FTD patients showed deficits in language, memory, and executive function compared to AD patients and HCs (see Figure 1). AD patients also showed decreased general cognition compared to HC. Importantly, FTD patients performed the semantic task less effectively than ADs and HCs (see Figure 2). The balance between excitation and inhibition (EIB = glutamate/GABA) was significantly decreased in the temporal lobe in FTD patients compared to HCs (see Figure 3). Conclusions FTD demonstrated cognitive deficits in language, memory, and executive function, along with decreased semantic task performance and reduced EIB in the temporal lobe. These preliminary findings support the GABA and glutamate hypothesis of FTD. Ongoing data collection on this CogNID project (IRAS reference: 250525, clinical trial reference: NCT03861884) will provide additional results, with more patient data to be presented at the AAIC conference.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), University of Nottingham (GB), Queen's Medical Centre (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.