Connectomic differences in cognitively normal APOE4 versus non‐APOE4 carriers at risk for Alzheimer’s Disease

Abstract Background Alzheimer's disease (AD) causes a steady degradation of connections inside the brain. The apolipoprotein E is a protein where one of its subtypes, APOE4, is a major genetic risk factor for developing late onset AD. Using a combination of tensor network PCA (TN‐PCA) and bundle analysis, we sought to determine which specific connections differentiate APOE4 individuals relative to non‐APOE4 carriers, and whether these changes increase with age. Method Our study included 77 individuals from 20 to 83 years old, 37 male and 40 female, 41 possessing only the APOE3 allele and 36 with at least one APOE4 allele. Imaging was done using diffusion weighted imaging, with a T1w anatomical scan also obtained for atlas based labeling and co‐registration. The tracts were modeled in subject space using mrtrix with anatomically constrained tractography and brought into the same template image space using our SAMBA registration pipeline. Connectomes of number of streamlines and the average FA were calculated with mrtrix. FA connectomes were used with TN‐PCA, determining which connections had higher weight for separating the genotype groups between APOE3 and APOE4. Streamlines of specific connections were split into bundles using dipy quickbundles. Statistical analysis compared linear and quadratic models for age, genotype and the interaction of the two. Result TN‐PCA results indicate that connections of precuneus to other structures had an important weight in APOE3 to APOE4 differentiation, particularly their inter‐hemispheric connection, their connection to the superior‐parietal region. Linear modeling showed the FA of precuneus connected streamlines had noticeable differences between APOE3 and APOE4 groups. These differences were exacerbated in specific bundles: precuneus‐right to precuneus‐left, and precuneus‐left to superiorparietal‐left connection. Conclusion Our results indicate that the precuneus connections differentiate between APOE4 and non‐APOE4 carriers. Future studies will address separately the white matter and grey matter streamline sections, and we will add further analysis along the streamlines for increased specificity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.092992
Primary Topic
Phosphodiesterase function and regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Connectomic differences in cognitively normal APOE4 versus non‐APOE4 carriers at risk for Alzheimer’s Disease

Alexandra Badea, Kim G. Johnson, Jacques Stout, Hae Sol Moon et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Phosphodiesterase function and regulation
article

Connectomic differences in cognitively normal APOE4 versus non‐APOE4 carriers at risk for Alzheimer’s Disease

Alexandra Badea, Kim G. Johnson, Jacques Stout, Hae Sol Moon, Ali Mahzarnia, Zay Yar Han
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Alzheimer's disease (AD) causes a steady degradation of connections inside the brain. The apolipoprotein E is a protein where one of its subtypes, APOE4, is a major genetic risk factor for developing late onset AD. Using a combination of tensor network PCA (TN‐PCA) and bundle analysis, we sought to determine which specific connections differentiate APOE4 individuals relative to non‐APOE4 carriers, and whether these changes increase with age. Method Our study included 77 individuals from 20 to 83 years old, 37 male and 40 female, 41 possessing only the APOE3 allele and 36 with at least one APOE4 allele. Imaging was done using diffusion weighted imaging, with a T1w anatomical scan also obtained for atlas based labeling and co‐registration. The tracts were modeled in subject space using mrtrix with anatomically constrained tractography and brought into the same template image space using our SAMBA registration pipeline. Connectomes of number of streamlines and the average FA were calculated with mrtrix. FA connectomes were used with TN‐PCA, determining which connections had higher weight for separating the genotype groups between APOE3 and APOE4. Streamlines of specific connections were split into bundles using dipy quickbundles. Statistical analysis compared linear and quadratic models for age, genotype and the interaction of the two. Result TN‐PCA results indicate that connections of precuneus to other structures had an important weight in APOE3 to APOE4 differentiation, particularly their inter‐hemispheric connection, their connection to the superior‐parietal region. Linear modeling showed the FA of precuneus connected streamlines had noticeable differences between APOE3 and APOE4 groups. These differences were exacerbated in specific bundles: precuneus‐right to precuneus‐left, and precuneus‐left to superiorparietal‐left connection. Conclusion Our results indicate that the precuneus connections differentiate between APOE4 and non‐APOE4 carriers. Future studies will address separately the white matter and grey matter streamline sections, and we will add further analysis along the streamlines for increased specificity.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Duke University (US), Duke Medical Center (US), Duke University Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Phosphodiesterase function and regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.