Advancing Early Detection of Alzheimer’s Disease in the Primary Care Setting in the United States

Abstract Background Recent advances in diagnostics have made it possible to identify early signs of the pathophysiological changes underlying Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) via blood tests. However, the use of blood‐based biomarkers (BBBMs) for the early detection of AD may be limited in primary care settings despite its potential for wide access and early detection of AD (PMID: 37295421) . Therefore, there is a need to understand the barriers and facilitators of BBBM testing for AD in primary care. Method We employed a combination of qualitative research, advisory board, and quantitative survey to engage with clinical/scientific advisors and community‐based physicians in primary care. In‐depth interviews with primary care physicians (PCPs) (n = 23) were conducted to understand the current awareness and clinical practice of AD identification in the primary care setting, followed by an advisory board to establish hypotheses about the barriers and opportunities of BBBM testing in the primary care setting. We subsequently conducted a quantitative survey with US PCPs (n = 600) to understand their attitudes and beliefs on screening and diagnosing AD in their practice, including opinions and willingness to use BBBM as part of the evaluation of individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild dementia. Results Preliminary findings revealed that the majority of PCPs believe that MCI/mild AD is underdiagnosed and BBBM will likely facilitate better and faster diagnosis. Identified obstacles encompass inadequate financial coverage for BBBM testing, limited awareness among PCPs regarding the tests’ availability and value, limited awareness about monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatment for early‐stage AD, and lack of understanding of where and how to incorporate BBBM testing into primary care. Suggested solutions included education to equip PCPs with necessary knowledge on BBBM testing, clear guidelines on incorporating BBBMs simultaneously with clinical and cognitive assessments, and adequate financial coverage for both BBBMs and mAb treatments. Final survey results will be presented at the AAIC. Conclusion The findings suggest that PCPs recognize the substantial value of BBBMs in detecting early AD, and that there is an urgent need for a concerted effort to improve awareness and address the barriers to adopting BBBMs in primary care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.086582
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing Early Detection of Alzheimer’s Disease in the Primary Care Setting in the United States

Yan Hu, Monica W. Parker, Harald Hampel, Jonathan Liss et al.
1 citations
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
0.71
article

Advancing Early Detection of Alzheimer’s Disease in the Primary Care Setting in the United States

Yan Hu, Monica W. Parker, Harald Hampel, Jonathan Liss, H. Ricky Kurzman, Min Cho, Steven R. Smith, J. Simon Bell, Jeffrey Murray Burns, Thomas O. Obisesan, Michelle M. Mielke, Lawrence S. Honig, Michael Hornbecker, Arnold Pallay
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Recent advances in diagnostics have made it possible to identify early signs of the pathophysiological changes underlying Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) via blood tests. However, the use of blood‐based biomarkers (BBBMs) for the early detection of AD may be limited in primary care settings despite its potential for wide access and early detection of AD (PMID: 37295421) . Therefore, there is a need to understand the barriers and facilitators of BBBM testing for AD in primary care. Method We employed a combination of qualitative research, advisory board, and quantitative survey to engage with clinical/scientific advisors and community‐based physicians in primary care. In‐depth interviews with primary care physicians (PCPs) (n = 23) were conducted to understand the current awareness and clinical practice of AD identification in the primary care setting, followed by an advisory board to establish hypotheses about the barriers and opportunities of BBBM testing in the primary care setting. We subsequently conducted a quantitative survey with US PCPs (n = 600) to understand their attitudes and beliefs on screening and diagnosing AD in their practice, including opinions and willingness to use BBBM as part of the evaluation of individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild dementia. Results Preliminary findings revealed that the majority of PCPs believe that MCI/mild AD is underdiagnosed and BBBM will likely facilitate better and faster diagnosis. Identified obstacles encompass inadequate financial coverage for BBBM testing, limited awareness among PCPs regarding the tests’ availability and value, limited awareness about monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatment for early‐stage AD, and lack of understanding of where and how to incorporate BBBM testing into primary care. Suggested solutions included education to equip PCPs with necessary knowledge on BBBM testing, clear guidelines on incorporating BBBMs simultaneously with clinical and cognitive assessments, and adequate financial coverage for both BBBMs and mAb treatments. Final survey results will be presented at the AAIC. Conclusion The findings suggest that PCPs recognize the substantial value of BBBMs in detecting early AD, and that there is an urgent need for a concerted effort to improve awareness and address the barriers to adopting BBBMs in primary care.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Howard University (US), University of Kansas (US), Emory University (US), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), AdventHealth Orlando (US), Columbus Center (US), Eisai (United States) (US), Wake Forest University (US), Atlantic Health System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.