White matter aging in late midlife women: Validation and association with neurodegenerative biomarkers

Abstract Background Brain age (BA) prediction models have emerged as valuable tools for understanding individual differences in trajectories of brain aging. These models aim to estimate overall brain health by predicting BA based on structural MRI data. To enhance the specificity of existing BA models, we introduce a deep learning‐based BA prediction model. The model focuses on the cerebral white matter to assess the prominent cerebrovascular AD risk pathway for women. Here we validate our deep learning‐derived white matter brain age (WMBA) in a sample of late midlife women enrolled in MsBrain. We also examine WMBA in relation to plasma neurodegenerative biomarkers in this sample. Method We developed an age‐conditioned variational autoencoder along with a multilayer perceptron (MLP) for brain age prediction (Figure 1). The model was trained on the Human Connectome Project healthy aging (HCP‐A) dataset (female, n=396; male, n=316, 36‐90 yr, mean=60 yr). To achieve white matter specificity, the model was trained only on the myelin ratio map. Adaptability and credibility were assessed by testing the model with MsBrain data, a study for which midlife women with no cardiovascular disease, stroke, or dementia were recruited (n=239, 45‐67 yr, mean=59 yr). Plasma biomarkers included amyloid β (aβ) 42, phosphorylated tau (181, 231), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and neurofilament light (NFL) via Simoa. All brain age predictions underwent bias correction through fitted linear regression models. Result Figure 1 shows the overall WMBA model schematics, including myelin ratio map training inputs, brain age predictions, and generated WMBA outputs. Compared with chronological age, the WMBA model was more strongly associated with cerebral white matter volume (Figure 2a). When considering brain age gap (i.e., difference between predicted brain age and chronological age), a greater brain age gap (indicating older brain age) was found with lower cerebral white matter ratio (Figure 2b). Lastly, greater WMBA was associated with higher GFAP and aβ42. Conclusion This work validates a new approach for measuring WMBA and demonstrates its utility in studies of midlife women. Findings indicate that WMBA varies with plasma markers of neurodegeneration in late midlife women, suggesting a novel neuroimaging marker to detect early neurodegenerative changes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.092818
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

White matter aging in late midlife women: Validation and association with neurodegenerative biomarkers

Shaolin Yang, Yue‐Fang Chang, Carol A. Derby, Jinghang Li et al.
1 links
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
article

White matter aging in late midlife women: Validation and association with neurodegenerative biomarkers

Shaolin Yang, Yue‐Fang Chang, Carol A. Derby, Jinghang Li, Linghai Wang, Rebecca C. Thurston, Thomas K. Karikari, Howard Jay Aizenstein, Pauline M. Maki, Minjie Wu, Chang‐Le Chen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Brain age (BA) prediction models have emerged as valuable tools for understanding individual differences in trajectories of brain aging. These models aim to estimate overall brain health by predicting BA based on structural MRI data. To enhance the specificity of existing BA models, we introduce a deep learning‐based BA prediction model. The model focuses on the cerebral white matter to assess the prominent cerebrovascular AD risk pathway for women. Here we validate our deep learning‐derived white matter brain age (WMBA) in a sample of late midlife women enrolled in MsBrain. We also examine WMBA in relation to plasma neurodegenerative biomarkers in this sample. Method We developed an age‐conditioned variational autoencoder along with a multilayer perceptron (MLP) for brain age prediction (Figure 1). The model was trained on the Human Connectome Project healthy aging (HCP‐A) dataset (female, n=396; male, n=316, 36‐90 yr, mean=60 yr). To achieve white matter specificity, the model was trained only on the myelin ratio map. Adaptability and credibility were assessed by testing the model with MsBrain data, a study for which midlife women with no cardiovascular disease, stroke, or dementia were recruited (n=239, 45‐67 yr, mean=59 yr). Plasma biomarkers included amyloid β (aβ) 42, phosphorylated tau (181, 231), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and neurofilament light (NFL) via Simoa. All brain age predictions underwent bias correction through fitted linear regression models. Result Figure 1 shows the overall WMBA model schematics, including myelin ratio map training inputs, brain age predictions, and generated WMBA outputs. Compared with chronological age, the WMBA model was more strongly associated with cerebral white matter volume (Figure 2a). When considering brain age gap (i.e., difference between predicted brain age and chronological age), a greater brain age gap (indicating older brain age) was found with lower cerebral white matter ratio (Figure 2b). Lastly, greater WMBA was associated with higher GFAP and aβ42. Conclusion This work validates a new approach for measuring WMBA and demonstrates its utility in studies of midlife women. Findings indicate that WMBA varies with plasma markers of neurodegeneration in late midlife women, suggesting a novel neuroimaging marker to detect early neurodegenerative changes.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.