The Berkeley PET Imaging Pipeline: Harmonization of Alzheimer’s disease PET biomarkers across studies

Abstract Background Collection of neuroimaging data is resource‐intensive. Multi‐site studies have emerged as an effective way to amass large collections of PET scans, but data collected across many sites and scanners require specialized processing approaches. The Berkeley PET Imaging Pipeline (BPIP) and tools for numerical data post‐processing allow us to 1) process multi‐site and multi‐study PET scans using harmonized, largely automated tools and 2) disseminate numerical quantitative data. Method PET data are harmonized by first using standard, tracer‐specific PET protocols and applying spatial smoothing to achieve a uniform resolution across scanners and sites. Using BPIP we complete MRI‐dependent or MRI‐free processing of PET scans which includes 1) definition of ROIs (MRI‐dependent: FreeSurfer Desikan‐Killiany in native space; MRI‐free: normalized probability Desikan‐Killiany in template space), 2) intensity normalization using a primary reference region, and 3) calculation of standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) across atlas ROIs, composite ROIs (e.g., temporal metaROI for tau tracers) and alternative reference regions (e.g., for longitudinal analyses). Tau‐PET scans are also partial volume corrected. BPIP runs on the XNAT platform on a dedicated server. For the MRI‐dependent pipeline, visual quality control (QC) is performed on automatically generated QC images that allow us to assess co‐registration and ROI delineation. We use a suite of software tools to curate and format the standardized numerical data. For studies that allow it, we release numerical quantitative PET data to the research community. For research conducted in our lab, we create datasets that combine neuroimaging data with other variables (e.g., demographic, genetic, cognitive). Result Using our current approach, we have processed over 20,000 PET scans across 8 Ab and tau tracers and corresponding T1 MRIs from more than a dozen studies. We have made data from more than 10,000 Ab and tau‐PET scans available in publicly shared ADNI, SCAN and POINTER Imaging datasets. For studies where we are not able to share numerical data publicly, we share data with individual investigators when formal approval is granted by the original study. Conclusion BPIP and associated software for data post‐processing are a powerful engine supporting the analysis and dissemination of Alzheimer’s disease PET biomarker data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.095834
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Berkeley PET Imaging Pipeline: Harmonization of Alzheimer’s disease PET biomarkers across studies

William J. Jagust, Suzanne L. Baker, Theresa M. Harrison, Martin S. Boswell et al.
1 citations
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
0.40
article

The Berkeley PET Imaging Pipeline: Harmonization of Alzheimer’s disease PET biomarkers across studies

William J. Jagust, Suzanne L. Baker, Theresa M. Harrison, Martin S. Boswell, Susan M. Landau
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Collection of neuroimaging data is resource‐intensive. Multi‐site studies have emerged as an effective way to amass large collections of PET scans, but data collected across many sites and scanners require specialized processing approaches. The Berkeley PET Imaging Pipeline (BPIP) and tools for numerical data post‐processing allow us to 1) process multi‐site and multi‐study PET scans using harmonized, largely automated tools and 2) disseminate numerical quantitative data. Method PET data are harmonized by first using standard, tracer‐specific PET protocols and applying spatial smoothing to achieve a uniform resolution across scanners and sites. Using BPIP we complete MRI‐dependent or MRI‐free processing of PET scans which includes 1) definition of ROIs (MRI‐dependent: FreeSurfer Desikan‐Killiany in native space; MRI‐free: normalized probability Desikan‐Killiany in template space), 2) intensity normalization using a primary reference region, and 3) calculation of standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) across atlas ROIs, composite ROIs (e.g., temporal metaROI for tau tracers) and alternative reference regions (e.g., for longitudinal analyses). Tau‐PET scans are also partial volume corrected. BPIP runs on the XNAT platform on a dedicated server. For the MRI‐dependent pipeline, visual quality control (QC) is performed on automatically generated QC images that allow us to assess co‐registration and ROI delineation. We use a suite of software tools to curate and format the standardized numerical data. For studies that allow it, we release numerical quantitative PET data to the research community. For research conducted in our lab, we create datasets that combine neuroimaging data with other variables (e.g., demographic, genetic, cognitive). Result Using our current approach, we have processed over 20,000 PET scans across 8 Ab and tau tracers and corresponding T1 MRIs from more than a dozen studies. We have made data from more than 10,000 Ab and tau‐PET scans available in publicly shared ADNI, SCAN and POINTER Imaging datasets. For studies where we are not able to share numerical data publicly, we share data with individual investigators when formal approval is granted by the original study. Conclusion BPIP and associated software for data post‐processing are a powerful engine supporting the analysis and dissemination of Alzheimer’s disease PET biomarker data.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.