Evaluating Source Code Comment Quality: The Need for Comprehensive Indexes in Software Development

In the realm of software development, the quality of source code, comments, and documentation is pivotal for project success, impacting maintainability, readability, and scalability. This paper explores the necessity of developing comprehensive indexes that evaluate these components, enhancing codebase quality assessment. Existing studies have emphasized the importance of metrics in software quality, addressing various aspects such as syntax, structure, complexity, and adherence to coding standards. However, a holistic approach that includes comments and documentation is crucial. By integrating techniques like natural language processing and static code analysis, sophisticated models can be developed to provide real-time feedback and improve software maintainability. This paper compares and analyses different source code indexes, highlighting their similarities, differences, and functionalities, thus contributing to the advancement of software quality assurance practices. The findings aim to assist developers, project managers, and stakeholders in making informed decisions and fostering continuous improvement in software development processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icamac62387.2024.10829019
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Software Engineering Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Source Code Comment Quality: The Need for Comprehensive Indexes in Software Development

M. Fatih Adak, M. Alp Eren Kilic
1 citations
Software Engineering Research
0.78
article

Evaluating Source Code Comment Quality: The Need for Comprehensive Indexes in Software Development

M. Fatih Adak, M. Alp Eren Kilic
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In the realm of software development, the quality of source code, comments, and documentation is pivotal for project success, impacting maintainability, readability, and scalability. This paper explores the necessity of developing comprehensive indexes that evaluate these components, enhancing codebase quality assessment. Existing studies have emphasized the importance of metrics in software quality, addressing various aspects such as syntax, structure, complexity, and adherence to coding standards. However, a holistic approach that includes comments and documentation is crucial. By integrating techniques like natural language processing and static code analysis, sophisticated models can be developed to provide real-time feedback and improve software maintainability. This paper compares and analyses different source code indexes, highlighting their similarities, differences, and functionalities, thus contributing to the advancement of software quality assurance practices. The findings aim to assist developers, project managers, and stakeholders in making informed decisions and fostering continuous improvement in software development processes.

Sakarya University (TR)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Software Engineering Research
0.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating Source Code Comment Quality: The Need for Comprehensive Indexes in Software Development — M. Fatih Adak, M. Alp Eren Kilic · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS