Factors Influencing Operator Expertise in Bilateral Telerobotic Operations: A User Study

This paper presents a detailed user study aimed at experimentally comparing the experience levels within bi-lateral teleoperation. The primary objective is to elucidate the key performance metrics that can effectively evaluate the competency level of human operators. Existing methodologies typically focus on the quantitative psychological evaluation of human-in-the-loop systems rather than operator performance. In our experimental study, six novice and four professional operators participated in various telerobotic activities. Various parameters, including task completion duration, errors, remote manipulators' motion, and subjects' gaze information, were captured. Subsequently, the measured performance parameters across all subjects were compared with respect to their level of proficiency through statistical analyses. The results indicate that tasks were performed more quickly by experienced operators, fewer mistakes were made, and remote manipulators were operated more smoothly (e.g., fewer jerks and better maintenance within the centre of the workspace). Additionally, better compensation for the lack of depth perception was demonstrated by experienced operators through effective scanning of multiple viewpoints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icarcv63323.2024.10821577
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Collaboration in agile enterprises
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors Influencing Operator Expertise in Bilateral Telerobotic Operations: A User Study

Harun Tugal, Shu Shirai, Robert Skilton, Fumiaki Abe et al.
1 citations
Collaboration in agile enterprises
0.73
article

Factors Influencing Operator Expertise in Bilateral Telerobotic Operations: A User Study

Harun Tugal, Shu Shirai, Robert Skilton, Fumiaki Abe, Ipek Caliskanelli, Masaki Sakamoto
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a detailed user study aimed at experimentally comparing the experience levels within bi-lateral teleoperation. The primary objective is to elucidate the key performance metrics that can effectively evaluate the competency level of human operators. Existing methodologies typically focus on the quantitative psychological evaluation of human-in-the-loop systems rather than operator performance. In our experimental study, six novice and four professional operators participated in various telerobotic activities. Various parameters, including task completion duration, errors, remote manipulators' motion, and subjects' gaze information, were captured. Subsequently, the measured performance parameters across all subjects were compared with respect to their level of proficiency through statistical analyses. The results indicate that tasks were performed more quickly by experienced operators, fewer mistakes were made, and remote manipulators were operated more smoothly (e.g., fewer jerks and better maintenance within the centre of the workspace). Additionally, better compensation for the lack of depth perception was demonstrated by experienced operators through effective scanning of multiple viewpoints.

United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Collaboration in agile enterprises
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.