Utilization of E-Government Services: A Replication

This study replicates Carter and Bélanger’s (2005) study of the utilization of e-government services. Almost two decades have passed since the paper was published. In the interim, e-government services have become increasingly popular in the United States (U.S.). Electronic access was the only choice for accessing some e-government services during the quarantine times of the COVID-19 shutdown. The extensive developments in technology may change citizens’ intention to use e-government services, as well as factors that affect those intentions. Further, Carter and Bélanger (2005) only studied citizens from a single U.S. state. These changes in context, as well as the original geographic limitation, warrant a replication of their study. We conducted a methodological replication based on data from a survey of citizens throughout the U.S. We used the original survey scales as they were related to the context of a common e-government domain, motor vehicle-related services. Our results confirm the original study’s findings with respect to perceived ease of use, image, compatibility, and trustworthiness. However, our model found a relative advantage to be a significant predictor of use intentions, while the original study did not. To test the robustness of Carter and Bélanger’s model, we tested alternate conceptualizations using a different statistical method. Overall, our results indicate that the original study’s findings largely hold, but that alternate conceptualizations may also be viable. Our findings hold implications for future research and practice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
AIS Transactions on Replication Research
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17705/1atrr.00086
Citations
1
Primary Topic
E-Government and Public Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Utilization of E-Government Services: A Replication

Craig Van Slyke, Henry Le, Kevin Lee Elder, Joseph Mansour
1 citations
AIS Transactions on Replication Research
E-Government and Public Services
2.23
article

Utilization of E-Government Services: A Replication

Craig Van Slyke, Henry Le, Kevin Lee Elder, Joseph Mansour
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study replicates Carter and Bélanger’s (2005) study of the utilization of e-government services. Almost two decades have passed since the paper was published. In the interim, e-government services have become increasingly popular in the United States (U.S.). Electronic access was the only choice for accessing some e-government services during the quarantine times of the COVID-19 shutdown. The extensive developments in technology may change citizens’ intention to use e-government services, as well as factors that affect those intentions. Further, Carter and Bélanger (2005) only studied citizens from a single U.S. state. These changes in context, as well as the original geographic limitation, warrant a replication of their study. We conducted a methodological replication based on data from a survey of citizens throughout the U.S. We used the original survey scales as they were related to the context of a common e-government domain, motor vehicle-related services. Our results confirm the original study’s findings with respect to perceived ease of use, image, compatibility, and trustworthiness. However, our model found a relative advantage to be a significant predictor of use intentions, while the original study did not. To test the robustness of Carter and Bélanger’s model, we tested alternate conceptualizations using a different statistical method. Overall, our results indicate that the original study’s findings largely hold, but that alternate conceptualizations may also be viable. Our findings hold implications for future research and practice.

AIS Transactions on Replication ResearchVol. 10(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
E-Government and Public Services
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.