Impact of the observation frequency coverage on the significance of a gravitational wave background detection in pulsar timing array data

Pulsar timing srray (PTA) collaborations gather high-precision timing measurements of pulsars, with the aim of detecting gravitational wave (GW) signals. A major challenge lies in the identification and characterisation of the different sources of noise that may hamper their sensitivity to GWs. The presence of time-correlated noise that resembles the target signal might give rise to degeneracies that can directly impact the detection statistics. In this work, we focus on the covariance that exists between a ‘chromatic’ dispersion measure (DM) noise and an ‘achromatic’ stochastic gravitational wave background (GWB). The term ‘chromatic’ associated with the DM noise means that its amplitude depends on the frequency of the incoming pulsar photons measured by the radio telescopes. Multi-frequency coverage is then required to accurately characterise its chromatic features and when the coverage of incoming frequency is poor, it becomes impossible to disentangle chromatic and achromatic noise contributions. In this paper, we explore this situation by injecting realistic GWB into 100 realisations of two mock versions of the second data release (DR2) of the European PTA (EPTA), characterised by different types of frequency coverage. The first dataset is a faithful copy of DR2, in which the first half of the data is dominated by only one frequency channel for the observations; the second one is identical, except for a more homogeneous frequency coverage across the full dataset. We show that for 91% of the injections, a better frequency coverage leads to an improved statistical significance (≈1.3 dex higher log Bayes factor on average) of the GWB and a better characterisation of its properties. We propose a metric to quantify the degeneracy between DM and GWB parameters. We show that it is correlated with a loss of significance for the recovered GWB, as well as with an increase in the GWB bias towards a higher and flatter spectral shape. In the second part of the paper, this correlation between the loss of GWB significance, the degeneracy between the DM and GWB parameters, and the frequency coverage is further investigated using an analytical toy model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202452805
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of the observation frequency coverage on the significance of a gravitational wave background detection in pulsar timing array data

Ismaël Cognard, A. Chalumeau, Alberto Sesana, M. Falxa et al.
3 citations
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
3.46
article

Impact of the observation frequency coverage on the significance of a gravitational wave background detection in pulsar timing array data

Ismaël Cognard, A. Chalumeau, Alberto Sesana, M. Falxa, G. Shaifullah, N. K. Porayko, M. Kramer, Kuo Liu, G. Theureau, Lucas Guillemot, Irene Ferranti
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Pulsar timing srray (PTA) collaborations gather high-precision timing measurements of pulsars, with the aim of detecting gravitational wave (GW) signals. A major challenge lies in the identification and characterisation of the different sources of noise that may hamper their sensitivity to GWs. The presence of time-correlated noise that resembles the target signal might give rise to degeneracies that can directly impact the detection statistics. In this work, we focus on the covariance that exists between a ‘chromatic’ dispersion measure (DM) noise and an ‘achromatic’ stochastic gravitational wave background (GWB). The term ‘chromatic’ associated with the DM noise means that its amplitude depends on the frequency of the incoming pulsar photons measured by the radio telescopes. Multi-frequency coverage is then required to accurately characterise its chromatic features and when the coverage of incoming frequency is poor, it becomes impossible to disentangle chromatic and achromatic noise contributions. In this paper, we explore this situation by injecting realistic GWB into 100 realisations of two mock versions of the second data release (DR2) of the European PTA (EPTA), characterised by different types of frequency coverage. The first dataset is a faithful copy of DR2, in which the first half of the data is dominated by only one frequency channel for the observations; the second one is identical, except for a more homogeneous frequency coverage across the full dataset. We show that for 91% of the injections, a better frequency coverage leads to an improved statistical significance (≈1.3 dex higher log Bayes factor on average) of the GWB and a better characterisation of its properties. We propose a metric to quantify the degeneracy between DM and GWB parameters. We show that it is correlated with a loss of significance for the recovered GWB, as well as with an increase in the GWB bias towards a higher and flatter spectral shape. In the second part of the paper, this correlation between the loss of GWB significance, the degeneracy between the DM and GWB parameters, and the frequency coverage is further investigated using an analytical toy model.

Astronomy and AstrophysicsVol. 694
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Janssen (France) (FR), Laboratoire Univers et Théories (FR), Laboratoire de Physique et Chimie de l’Environnement et de l’Espace (FR)
European Commission, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, Observatoire de Paris, Université de Recherche Paris Sciences et Lettres, European Research Council, Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
3.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.