Melt electrowriting of amorphous solid dispersions: Influence of drug and plasticizer on rheology and printing performance

Drug loaded microfiber scaffolds have potential for sublingual or buccal drug delivery due to their fast dissolution time and tunable porosity. Such microfiber scaffolds can be prepared by melt electrowriting (MEW), wherein a polymer melt is electrostatically drawn out of a syringe onto a computer controlled moving collector. The fabrication of such scaffolds via MEW has previously been shown for a polymer with a glass transition temperature (T<sub>g</sub>) just above room temperature, making handling challenging. For this reason, ABA triblock copolymers bearing poly(2-oxazoline) and poly(2-oxazine) with slightly higher T<sub>g</sub> were synthesized and their processability into drug loaded microfiber scaffolds was assessed. Additionally, plasticizers commonly used in drug products were added to decrease the fabrication temperature. The aim was to investigate the influence of plasticizers on the melt viscosity and printability to expand the polymer platform for the preparation of drug loaded microfiber scaffolds. Temperature dependent melt rheology measurements of the polymers and their mixtures revealed a drop in viscosity by one order of magnitude by the addition of triethyl citrate and ethylene glycol, respectively. Addition of the model drug indomethacin led to a further decrease in viscosity. Even though the drug loaded samples were printable with and without the addition of triethyl citrate, better fiber stacking and therefore improved printing results were obtained with the plasticizer added. However, the addition of the plasticizer did alter the dissolution profile for some of the polymer samples, leading to longer dissolution times or lower drug release compared to the samples without plasticizer, which makes it difficult to predict the influence of the plasticizer on the dissolution profile.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Pharmaceutics
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.125188
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.19

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Melt electrowriting of amorphous solid dispersions: Influence of drug and plasticizer on rheology and printing performance

Robert Luxenhofer, Larissa Keßler
3 citations
International Journal of Pharmaceutics
Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies
2.19
article

Melt electrowriting of amorphous solid dispersions: Influence of drug and plasticizer on rheology and printing performance

Robert Luxenhofer, Larissa Keßler
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Drug loaded microfiber scaffolds have potential for sublingual or buccal drug delivery due to their fast dissolution time and tunable porosity. Such microfiber scaffolds can be prepared by melt electrowriting (MEW), wherein a polymer melt is electrostatically drawn out of a syringe onto a computer controlled moving collector. The fabrication of such scaffolds via MEW has previously been shown for a polymer with a glass transition temperature (T<sub>g</sub>) just above room temperature, making handling challenging. For this reason, ABA triblock copolymers bearing poly(2-oxazoline) and poly(2-oxazine) with slightly higher T<sub>g</sub> were synthesized and their processability into drug loaded microfiber scaffolds was assessed. Additionally, plasticizers commonly used in drug products were added to decrease the fabrication temperature. The aim was to investigate the influence of plasticizers on the melt viscosity and printability to expand the polymer platform for the preparation of drug loaded microfiber scaffolds. Temperature dependent melt rheology measurements of the polymers and their mixtures revealed a drop in viscosity by one order of magnitude by the addition of triethyl citrate and ethylene glycol, respectively. Addition of the model drug indomethacin led to a further decrease in viscosity. Even though the drug loaded samples were printable with and without the addition of triethyl citrate, better fiber stacking and therefore improved printing results were obtained with the plasticizer added. However, the addition of the plasticizer did alter the dissolution profile for some of the polymer samples, leading to longer dissolution times or lower drug release compared to the samples without plasticizer, which makes it difficult to predict the influence of the plasticizer on the dissolution profile.

International Journal of PharmaceuticsVol. 671
University of Helsinki (FI), Helsinki Institute of Physics (FI)
Academy of Finland
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies
2.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.