Local field potential phase modulates the evoked response to electrical stimulation in visual cortex

<i>Objective.</i>Development of cortical visual prostheses requires optimization of evoked responses to electrical stimulation to reduce charge requirements and improve safety, efficiency, and efficacy. One promising approach is timing stimulation to the local field potential (LFP), where action potentials have been found to occur preferentially at specific phases. To assess the relationship between electrical stimulation and the phase of the LFP, we recorded action potentials from primary (V1) and secondary (V2) visual cortex in marmosets while delivering single-pulse electrical microstimulation at different phases of the LFP.<i>Approach.</i>A 64-channel 4 shank probe was inserted into V1 and V2. Microstimulation (single biphasic pulse, 10<i>µ</i>A and 200<i>µ</i>s per phase) was applied to selected channels in V1, and action potentials recorded simultaneously in V1 and V2. Microstimulation pulses were jittered in time to randomize the phase of the LFP at the time of stimulation.<i>Results.</i>We found frequency-specific phase modulation in a subset of units, where microstimulation in V1 evokes a higher firing rate in both V1 and V2 when delivered at specific phases of the LFP. We characterize phase modulation in terms of the preferred phase and frequency of V1 stimulation for responses in both V1 and V2, and effect size as a function of phase estimation accuracy.<i>Significance.</i>Phase modulation could reduce charge requirements for neural activation, reducing the volume of activated tissue and improving the safety, efficacy, and specificity of cortical visual prostheses. Phase modulation could allow cortical visual prostheses to stimulate using more simultaneous electrodes, with improved neural specificity, and, potentially, targeting downstream cortical activation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ada828
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Local field potential phase modulates the evoked response to electrical stimulation in visual cortex

Maureen A. Hagan, Nicholas S. C. Price, Tim Allison-Walker, Sabrina J Meikle et al.
3 citations
Journal of Neural Engineering
Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
2.73
article

Local field potential phase modulates the evoked response to electrical stimulation in visual cortex

Maureen A. Hagan, Nicholas S. C. Price, Tim Allison-Walker, Sabrina J Meikle, Yan T. Wong
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<i>Objective.</i>Development of cortical visual prostheses requires optimization of evoked responses to electrical stimulation to reduce charge requirements and improve safety, efficiency, and efficacy. One promising approach is timing stimulation to the local field potential (LFP), where action potentials have been found to occur preferentially at specific phases. To assess the relationship between electrical stimulation and the phase of the LFP, we recorded action potentials from primary (V1) and secondary (V2) visual cortex in marmosets while delivering single-pulse electrical microstimulation at different phases of the LFP.<i>Approach.</i>A 64-channel 4 shank probe was inserted into V1 and V2. Microstimulation (single biphasic pulse, 10<i>µ</i>A and 200<i>µ</i>s per phase) was applied to selected channels in V1, and action potentials recorded simultaneously in V1 and V2. Microstimulation pulses were jittered in time to randomize the phase of the LFP at the time of stimulation.<i>Results.</i>We found frequency-specific phase modulation in a subset of units, where microstimulation in V1 evokes a higher firing rate in both V1 and V2 when delivered at specific phases of the LFP. We characterize phase modulation in terms of the preferred phase and frequency of V1 stimulation for responses in both V1 and V2, and effect size as a function of phase estimation accuracy.<i>Significance.</i>Phase modulation could reduce charge requirements for neural activation, reducing the volume of activated tissue and improving the safety, efficacy, and specificity of cortical visual prostheses. Phase modulation could allow cortical visual prostheses to stimulate using more simultaneous electrodes, with improved neural specificity, and, potentially, targeting downstream cortical activation.

Journal of Neural EngineeringVol. 22(1)
La Trobe University (AU), Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (AU), Monash University (AU), RMIT University (AU)
Australian Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
2.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.