New Iran's Petroleum Contract “IPC” in comparison with Buy-back and Production Sharing Agreement

Iran's Petroleum Contract “IPC” as a risk service contract, contains some important improvements and features in order to attract foreign investments and know-how to the long-standing oil industry of Iran. However, the views of international oil companies (“IOC”) towards contractual regimes in the oil sector show that they are often not eager to enter into the risk service-prone contracts and therefore, IPC is another alternative and a new opportunity for IOCs to invest in the oil industry in Iran, as compared with Production Sharing Agreement (PSA) and modern concessions. According to the current laws and regulations, adopting PSA in Iran's oil industry is not strictly forbidden from legal point of view. Therefore, using a well-designed PSA, at least for some high risk and cost regions, may ensure the balance of interests between National Iranian Oil Company (“NIOC”) and foreign oil companies, without disrupting the existing IPC's framework. Thus, through JCPOA and removal of the sanctions, the Iranian authorities in the oil industry should be prepared to take more flexible and favorable attitude towards the petroleum contracts in Iran for the benefit of the country in compliance with the applicable laws and regulations. • IPC is a risk service contract that, rather than Buy-backs, has made many improvements to attract oil companies to Iran's long-standing oil industry but is still insufficient to meaningfully alter the pace of foreign investment into the upstream oil industry of Iran compared to common internationally used contract in the world. • International Oil Companies (“IOC”) have raised several objections on various aspects of the IPC claiming that these aspects diminish commercial attractiveness of this model like, inter alia, reserve booking, local content, recovery and payment ceiling, JMC, contractor rather than a partner. • The views of IOCs towards contractual regimes in the oil sector show that they are often not eager to enter into the risk service-prone contracts and therefore, IPC is another alternative and a new opportunity for IOCs to invest in the oil industry in Iran, as compared with Production Sharing Agreement (PSA) and modern concessions. • According to the current laws and regulations, adopting PSA in Iran's oil industry is not strictly forbidden from legal point of view. • Through JCPOA and removal of the sanctions, the Iranian authorities in the oil industry should be prepared to take more flexible and favorable attitude towards the petroleum contracts in Iran for the benefit of the country in compliance with the applicable laws and regulations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Strategy Reviews
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2024.101599
Primary Topic
State Capitalism and Financial Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New Iran's Petroleum Contract “IPC” in comparison with Buy-back and Production Sharing Agreement

Ehsan Afshar, Mohammad Ali Bahmaei
Energy Strategy Reviews
State Capitalism and Financial Governance
article

New Iran's Petroleum Contract “IPC” in comparison with Buy-back and Production Sharing Agreement

Ehsan Afshar, Mohammad Ali Bahmaei
article en

Abstract

Iran's Petroleum Contract “IPC” as a risk service contract, contains some important improvements and features in order to attract foreign investments and know-how to the long-standing oil industry of Iran. However, the views of international oil companies (“IOC”) towards contractual regimes in the oil sector show that they are often not eager to enter into the risk service-prone contracts and therefore, IPC is another alternative and a new opportunity for IOCs to invest in the oil industry in Iran, as compared with Production Sharing Agreement (PSA) and modern concessions. According to the current laws and regulations, adopting PSA in Iran's oil industry is not strictly forbidden from legal point of view. Therefore, using a well-designed PSA, at least for some high risk and cost regions, may ensure the balance of interests between National Iranian Oil Company (“NIOC”) and foreign oil companies, without disrupting the existing IPC's framework. Thus, through JCPOA and removal of the sanctions, the Iranian authorities in the oil industry should be prepared to take more flexible and favorable attitude towards the petroleum contracts in Iran for the benefit of the country in compliance with the applicable laws and regulations. • IPC is a risk service contract that, rather than Buy-backs, has made many improvements to attract oil companies to Iran's long-standing oil industry but is still insufficient to meaningfully alter the pace of foreign investment into the upstream oil industry of Iran compared to common internationally used contract in the world. • International Oil Companies (“IOC”) have raised several objections on various aspects of the IPC claiming that these aspects diminish commercial attractiveness of this model like, inter alia, reserve booking, local content, recovery and payment ceiling, JMC, contractor rather than a partner. • The views of IOCs towards contractual regimes in the oil sector show that they are often not eager to enter into the risk service-prone contracts and therefore, IPC is another alternative and a new opportunity for IOCs to invest in the oil industry in Iran, as compared with Production Sharing Agreement (PSA) and modern concessions. • According to the current laws and regulations, adopting PSA in Iran's oil industry is not strictly forbidden from legal point of view. • Through JCPOA and removal of the sanctions, the Iranian authorities in the oil industry should be prepared to take more flexible and favorable attitude towards the petroleum contracts in Iran for the benefit of the country in compliance with the applicable laws and regulations.

Energy Strategy ReviewsVol. 57
Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center (US), IIT@Harvard (US), Shahid Beheshti University (IR), Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
State Capitalism and Financial Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.