Two-loop form factors for P-wave quarkonium production and decay

A bstract We present the analytical results for the two-loop form factors needed for χ Q , J production and decay. We consider the two-loop corrections to the process $$ \gamma \gamma \leftrightarrow {}^3{P}_J^{\left[1\right]} $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>γγ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>↔</mml:mo> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> <mml:mi>J</mml:mi> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mfenced> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mprescripts/> <mml:none/> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:mmultiscripts> </mml:math> , that has been known only numerically before, and the processes $$ gg\leftrightarrow {}^3{P}_J^{\left[1\right]} $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>gg</mml:mi> <mml:mo>↔</mml:mo> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> <mml:mi>J</mml:mi> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mfenced> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mprescripts/> <mml:none/> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:mmultiscripts> </mml:math> , $$ \gamma g\leftrightarrow {}^3{P}_J^{\left[8\right]} $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>γg</mml:mi> <mml:mo>↔</mml:mo> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> <mml:mi>J</mml:mi> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mn>8</mml:mn> </mml:mfenced> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mprescripts/> <mml:none/> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:mmultiscripts> </mml:math> and $$ gg\leftrightarrow {}^3{P}_J^{\left[8\right]} $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>gg</mml:mi> <mml:mo>↔</mml:mo> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> <mml:mi>J</mml:mi> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mn>8</mml:mn> </mml:mfenced> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mprescripts/> <mml:none/> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:mmultiscripts> </mml:math> , which have not been computed before. We observe that the NRQCD pole structure of the two-loop amplitude in the gg channel is more involved for the spin-triplet P -wave case than for the pseudo-scalar S -wave case. It involves in addition to the standard Coulomb singularity also a new singularity whose cancellation requires the inclusion of the $$ gg\leftrightarrow {}^3{S}_1^{\left[8\right]} $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>gg</mml:mi> <mml:mo>↔</mml:mo> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mn>8</mml:mn> </mml:mfenced> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mprescripts/> <mml:none/> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:mmultiscripts> </mml:math> form factor. We give the high precision numerical results for the hard functions that can be used to compute χ Q , J production and decay up to NNLO accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of High Energy Physics
Published
2025-06-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep06(2025)009
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two-loop form factors for P-wave quarkonium production and decay

Melih A. Ozcelik
1 citations
Journal of High Energy Physics
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
1.87
article

Two-loop form factors for P-wave quarkonium production and decay

Melih A. Ozcelik
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A bstract We present the analytical results for the two-loop form factors needed for χ Q , J production and decay. We consider the two-loop corrections to the process $$ \gamma \gamma \leftrightarrow {}^3{P}_J^{\left[1\right]} $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>γγ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>↔</mml:mo> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> <mml:mi>J</mml:mi> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mfenced> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mprescripts/> <mml:none/> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:mmultiscripts> </mml:math> , that has been known only numerically before, and the processes $$ gg\leftrightarrow {}^3{P}_J^{\left[1\right]} $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>gg</mml:mi> <mml:mo>↔</mml:mo> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> <mml:mi>J</mml:mi> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mfenced> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mprescripts/> <mml:none/> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:mmultiscripts> </mml:math> , $$ \gamma g\leftrightarrow {}^3{P}_J^{\left[8\right]} $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>γg</mml:mi> <mml:mo>↔</mml:mo> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> <mml:mi>J</mml:mi> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mn>8</mml:mn> </mml:mfenced> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mprescripts/> <mml:none/> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:mmultiscripts> </mml:math> and $$ gg\leftrightarrow {}^3{P}_J^{\left[8\right]} $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>gg</mml:mi> <mml:mo>↔</mml:mo> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> <mml:mi>J</mml:mi> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mn>8</mml:mn> </mml:mfenced> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mprescripts/> <mml:none/> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:mmultiscripts> </mml:math> , which have not been computed before. We observe that the NRQCD pole structure of the two-loop amplitude in the gg channel is more involved for the spin-triplet P -wave case than for the pseudo-scalar S -wave case. It involves in addition to the standard Coulomb singularity also a new singularity whose cancellation requires the inclusion of the $$ gg\leftrightarrow {}^3{S}_1^{\left[8\right]} $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>gg</mml:mi> <mml:mo>↔</mml:mo> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mn>8</mml:mn> </mml:mfenced> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mprescripts/> <mml:none/> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:mmultiscripts> </mml:math> form factor. We give the high precision numerical results for the hard functions that can be used to compute χ Q , J production and decay up to NNLO accuracy.

Journal of High Energy PhysicsVol. 2025(6)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Laboratoire de Physique des 2 Infinis Irène Joliot-Curie (FR)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
1.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.